Page 907 - The Toxicology of Fishes
P. 907

The Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Fish from Puget Sound, Washington  887


                                     120      Threshold = 290 ppb

                                     DNA adducts (nmol/mol bases)  80  CI: 6–1380 ppb
                                     100




                                      60

                                      40

                                      20

                                       0
                                        1        10      100      1000     10000    100000
                                                         Total PAHs (ppb)
                       FIGURE 22.5 Relationship between levels of PAH-like hepatic DNA adducts in oyster toadfish and concentrations of
                       polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment of the Elizabeth River. (From Collier, T.K. et al., Environ. Sci., 2,
                       161–177, 1993. With permission.)

                       contaminants, however, this measure should not be presumed to be diagnostic of PAH exposure in field
                       situations, unless PAHs are the only likely organic contaminant present, such as following oil spills
                       (Collier et al., 1996).

                       DNA Adducts
                       Covalent binding of carcinogenic PAHs to DNA (DNA adducts) in liver, an initial molecular step in the
                       chemical hepatocarcinogenesis model (Farber and Sarma, 1987), is observed in several species of fish
                       exposed to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and related PAHs (Collier et al., 1993; Ericson et al., 1999; Sikka et
                       al., 1991; Varanasi et al., 1989c). A very sensitive technique for determining levels of DNA adducts in
                       fish tissues is the  P-postlabeling (PPL) method, which was developed in Dr. Kurt Randerath’s laboratory
                                    32
                       in the early 1980s (Gupta et al., 1982) and has evolved substantially since then (Reichert et al., 1999).
                       Currently, the  P-postlabeling technique is the most sensitive method for the detection of a wide range
                                  32
                       of bulky, hydrophobic compounds bound to DNA. For hydrophobic, aromatic DNA adducts, such as
                       PAH–DNA adducts, this method can detect 1 adduct in 109 to 1010 (Gupta, 1985; Reddy and Randerath,
                                                                                          32
                       1986). The versatility and high sensitivity of the assay has led to the broad use of the  P-postlabeling
                       assay in studies with mammals and fish for assessing exposure to environmental genotoxins (Balch et
                       al., 1995; Dunn et al., 1987; Liu et al., 1991; Poginsky et al., 1990; Ray et al., 1991; Stein et al., 1992;
                       van der Oost et al., 1994; Varanasi et al., 1989d) and to specific genotoxic compounds, such as BaP and
                       7H-dibenzo(c,g)carbazole (Ericson et al., 1999; Randerath et al., 1984; Schurdak et al., 1987; Sikka et
                       al., 1991; Stein et al., 1993; Varanasi et al., 1989c; Watson et al., 1998).
                                                       32
                        In 1987, we initiated studies using the  P-postlabeling assay to evaluate exposure of marine fish to
                       environmental carcinogens. These studies have shown that the levels of hepatic DNA adducts in wild
                       fish positively correlate with the concentrations of PAHs present in marine sediments (Collier et al.,
                       1993; Stein et al., 1992) (Figure 22.5). Moreover, laboratory studies with model PAHs and sediment
                       extracts have shown that PAH–DNA adducts formed are persistent and have chromatographic character-
                       istics similar to DNA adducts detected in wild fish (French et al., 1996; Stein et al., 1993; Varanasi et
                       al., 1989d) (Figure 22.6). The study by French et al. (1996) of English sole exposed to a gradient of
                       contaminated sediments showed that the levels of hepatic DNA adducts increased in both a time- and a
                       dose-dependent manner. These findings suggest that the levels of hepatic DNA adducts found in fish
                       tissues could function as indices of cumulative exposure to potentially genotoxic environmental contam-
                       inants, such as carcinogenic PAHs. The use of DNA adducts as an exposure index has several important
                       features. First, it is a quantifiable measure of the biologically effective dose reaching a critical target site
   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912