Page 143 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 143

120                                                       the WeLfare of CattLe


            Atkinson, D. J., M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2017. Benchmarking passive transfer of immu-
                nity and growth in dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 100:3773–3782. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11800.
            Becker,  J.,  M. G.  Doherr,  R. M.  Bruckmaier,  M.  Bodmer,  P.  Zanolari, and  A.  Steiner.  2012.  Acute and
                chronic pain in calves after different methods of rubber-ring castration. Journal of Veterinary Science
                194:380–385.
            Bergstra,  T.,  J.,  Bart Gremmen, and  Elsbeth N.  Stassen.  2015.  Moral values and attitudes toward Dutch
                sow husbandry.  Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics  28:375–401. doi:org/10.1007/
                s10806-015-9539-x.
            Brambell Committee. 1965. Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of livestock kept
                under intensive conditions; Command Paper 2836; Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK.
            Brown, K. H., and Hollingsworth, J., 2005. The food marketing institute and the National Council of Chain
                Restaurants: animal welfare and the retail food industry in the United States of America.  Revue
                  scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics) 24:655–663.
            Canadian Cattlemen’s Association and National Farm Animal Care Council (CCA-NFACC). 2014. Code of
                practice for the care and handling of beef cattle. www.nfacc.ca/pdfs/codes/beef_code_of_practice.pdf.
                Accessed October 8, 2017.
            Cantrell, R., Lubben, B., and Reese, D. 2013. Perceptions of food animal welfare in extension: results of a
                two-state survey. Journal of Extension 51(2), 2FEA7.
            Cardoso, C. S., M. J. Hötzel, D. M. Weary, J. A. Robbins, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk. 2016. Imagining the
                ideal dairy farm. Journal of Dairy Science 99:1663–1671. doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9925.
            Chapinal, N., A. Barrientos, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, E. Galo, and D. M. Weary. 2013. Herd-level risk
                factors for lameness in freestall farms in North Eastern US and California. Journal of Dairy Science
                96:318–328. doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5940.
            Chapinal, N., Y. Liang, D. M. Weary, Y. Wang, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk. 2014a. Risk factors for lame-
                ness and hock injuries in Holstein herds in China. Journal of Dairy Science 97:4309–4316. doi:10.3168/
                jds.2014-8089.
            Chapinal, N., D. M. Weary, L. Collings, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk. 2014b. Short communication: lameness
                and hock injuries improve on farms participating in an assessment program. The Veterinary Journal
                202:646–648. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.09.018.
            Clark, B., G. B. Stewart, L. A. PanzoneI Kyriazakis and L. J. Frewe. 2016. A systematic review of public
                attitudes, perceptions and behaviours towards production diseases associated with farm animal welfare.
                Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29:455–478. doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9615-x.
            Commission E., 2014. Final report of an audit carried out in the United Kingdom from 29 April to 09 May
                2014 in order to evaluate the animal welfare controls in place at slaughter and during related operations.
                In: Office EC-FaV, ed, 2014:21.
            Cook, NB. 2017. A comparison of measurable objective outcomes used to assess cattle welfare. In: Tucker, C.
                B. (ed). Advances in cattle welfare. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
            Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST).  2012.  The direct relationship between animal
                health and food safety outcomes. CAST Commentary QTA2012-1. CAST, Ames, Iowa.
            Dairy Farmers of Canada and National Farm Animal Care Council (DFC-NFACC). 2009. Code of practice for
                the care and handling of dairy cattle. www.nfacc.ca/pdfs/codes/dairy_code_of_practice.pdf. Accessed
                October 8, 2017.
            Duggan,  Tara.  2017. New ballot initiative could increase California farm animal welfare standards.  San
                Francisco  Chronicle,  published  August  27,  2017.  www.sfchronicle.com/food/article/New-ballot-
                initiative-could-increase-California-12159349.php. Accessed October 6, 2017.
            Eicher, S. D., H. W. Cheng, A. D. Sorrells, and M. M. Schutz. 2006. Short communication: behavioral and
                physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking. Journal of Dairy Science
                89:3047–3051. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72578-4.
            FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council). 1992. FAWC updates the five freedoms. The Veterinary Record 131:357.
            Flint, H. E., K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. G. Bateman, and D. B. Haley. 2014. Characteristics of loads
                of cattle stopping for feed, water and rest during long-distance transport in Canada. Animals 4, 62–81.
                doi:10.3390/ani4010062.
            Fong, S. W., E. W. L. Cheng, and D. C. K. Ho. 1998. Benchmarking: a general reading for management.
                Management Decision 36:407–418. doi:10.1108/00251749810223646.
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148