Page 1480 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 1480

1452   PART XIV   Infectious Diseases


            respond  appropriately to vaccination.  Immunosuppressed   tissues (Lappin et al., 2005), and some hypersensitized cats
            animals, including those with FeLV infection, FIV infection,   have developed lymphocytic-plasmacytic interstitial nephri-
  VetBooks.ir  canine parvovirus infection,  Ehrlichia canis infection, and   tis (Lappin et al., 2006b). The immunodominant cell line
                                                                 antigen recognized by parenterally vaccinated cats is alpha
            debilitating diseases, may not respond appropriately to vac-
            cination, and modified-live vaccines could potentially induce
                                                                 more et al., 2010). In people, anti-enolase antibodies are
            the disease in these animals.                        enolase, which is present in all mammalian cells (Whitte-
              If high levels of specific antibodies are present, efficacy of   markers for immune-mediated disease, including nephri-
            some vaccines is diminished. This is a particularly impor-  tis. Whether postvaccination or naturally occurring anti-
            tant consideration when vaccinating puppies or kittens from   enolase antibodies are associated with nephritis in cats is
            well-vaccinated dams. Disease may also develop in vacci-  still being studied. Intranasal products can result in transient
            nated puppies and kittens because infection had already   sneezing and coughing, but in cats are not associated with
            occurred and was incubating when the animal was vacci-  the development of anti-enolase antibodies (Whittemore
            nated. Vaccines can be rendered ineffective from mishan-  et al., 2010).
            dling.  As  most  vaccine  manufacturers  will  support  their   Suspected adverse reactions to vaccination should be
            products  if  administered by  a  veterinary  health  care  pro-  reported to the vaccine manufacturer. Administration of any
            fessional, it could be advantageous for owners to not pur-  vaccine to animals with proven vaccine-associated sarcoma
            chase and administer vaccines on their own. Vaccines should   or immune-mediated diseases, such as immune-mediated
            not be administered while the animal is under anesthesia   polyarthritis, immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, immune-
            because if a vaccine reaction occurs, clinical signs may not be    mediated thrombocytopenia, glomerulonephritis, or polyra-
            recognized.                                          diculoneuritis, is questionable because immune stimulation
              Adverse reactions can potentially occur with any vaccine.   may exacerbate  these  conditions.  However,  the potential
            However, they are relatively uncommon in dogs and cats and   legal ramifications of waiving vaccination in these patients
            recently have been reviewed (Gershwin, 2018). In a study   should be discussed with the owners and with appropriate
            of more than 1.2 million dogs, the overall rate of adverse   state and county representatives when rabies vaccination is
            reactions was 38.2/10,000 dogs that had received vaccines   in question.
            within the previous 3 days (Moore et al., 2005). In a study   For some infectious agents, including canine distem-
            of 496,189 cats, the overall rate of adverse reactions was   per virus (CDV), canine parvovirus, feline panleukopenia
            51.6/10,000 cats that had received vaccines within the previ-  virus (FPV), feline calicivirus (FCV), and FHV-1, serologic
            ous 30 days (Moore et al., 2007). In another study, vaccine   test  results  have  been  shown  to  correlate  to  resistance  to
            associated hypersensitivity reactions were estimated at 6.5   disease after challenge in some studies. The advantages
            per 10,000 vaccinated dogs (Yao et al., 2015). Vaccination   and disadvantages of the use of serologic testing have been
            has been associated with injection site sarcomas in some   reviewed (Moore et al., 2004). If validated laboratories or
            cats and can be life threatening. These tumors can occur   kits  are  used,  results  can  be  used  accurately  to  make  vac-
            after administration of infectious or noninfectious vaccines   cination decisions for some dogs and cats (Lappin et al.,
            (Dyer et al., 2009), but to date studies attempting to link   2002). For example, previously vaccinated animals that were
            different vaccine types or individual products to tumor for-  presumed to have had a vaccine reaction and are still at
            mation have had variable results (Kass et al., 2003; Srivastav   risk of exposure to infectious agents could be assessed by
            et al., 2012). Injection site sarcomas have developed after   serologic testing in lieu of arbitrary vaccination. In general,
            administration of other substances including parasiticides,   the positive predictive value of these tests is good (i.e., a
            long-lasting glucocorticoids, meloxicam, cisplatin, antibi-  positive test result usually predicts resistance on challenge)
            otics, and microchips. It is apparent that tumor develop-  for CDV, canine parvovirus, and FPV. Commercially avail-
            ment may relate to a genetic predisposition, but P53 gene   able kits for point of care testing are available in some
            testing has not provided definitive results in all cases (Banerji   countries.
            et al., 2007; Mucha et al., 2012). Based in the information
            available to date, it is impossible to determine the risk for   VACCINATION PROTOCOLS FOR CATS
            individual cats to develop injection site sarcomas, and the   A physical examination, fecal parasite screen, and assess-
            validity of current recommendations to avoid all adjuvants   ment of vaccine needs should be performed at least yearly
            have been questioned (Kass, 2018). Currently, the optimal   for all cats. The AAFP formed a Feline Vaccine Advisory
            way to avoid injection site sarcomas is to administer only   Panel to produce vaccine recommendations for cats (http://
            products absolutely indicated by this route, including using   www.catvets.com) in 2013 (Scherk et al., 2013). These guide-
            the longest vaccination interval acceptable for the vaccine   lines are an excellent source of information for veterinar-
            used. In addition, if  a cat has previously developed  an   ians when individualizing vaccination protocols. Vaccine
            injection site sarcoma, it is likely of risk of developing a   antigens were divided into those that were considered core
            second tumor, and parenteral injections should be avoided     (FPV, FCV, FHV-1) and noncore (rabies, FeLV, FIV,  B.
            if possible.                                         bronchiseptica,  Chlamydia felis, and feline infectious peri-
              Feline vaccines for which the viruses were grown on cell   tonitis [FIP]). In contrast to previous AAFP Panel Reports,
            cultures induce antibodies that cross-react with feline renal   rabies vaccines are no longer considered core because the
   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485