Page 170 - Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values 3rd Edition
P. 170

é 0.5000 - 1.7320  1.4999ù
                ê 0.5000 -                ú
                ê         0.9237   0.0999 ú
                ê 0.5000  0.0000 - 1.44999ú
            X s  = ê                      ú
                ê 0.5000 - 0.1154  0.0067 ú
                ê 0.5000  0.8083 - 0.0999 ú
                ê                         ú
                ë ê 0.5000  1.7320  1.49999ú û
                                                 ˇ
         Finally, delete from cˇ the elements for which C has elements i < j. The matrix cˇ is
                                                                ˇ
                                                                   ˇ
                                                             ˇ
                                                        ˇ
         now of the order k(k + 1)/2 by 1. For the example data, c′ = [C C C ]. The vector cˇ
                                                             00  10  11
         can now be calculated by a weighted least-square procedure as:
                        -1
            cˇ = (X′V ˆ  -1  X ) X′ V ˆ  -1  g ˘
                 s     s    s
         For the example data, c calculated using the above equation is:
                            ˇ
            cˇ = [341.8512  45.0421  24.5405]
                                     ˇ
                                                                         ˇ
         The reduced coefficient matrix C  is then constructed from the calculated c. Then a
         row and column of zeros are inserted in positions corresponding to those polynomials
                                                   ˇ
                             ˇ
         not included to obtain C. For the example data, C is now:
                 é341 8512.  45 0421 0 0 ù
                                       .
                               .
            C ˇ =  ê ê  45 0421  24 5405 0 0 ú ú
                     .
                                       .
                               .
                 ê ë  00      00      00 ú û
                               .
                     .
                                       .
         Kirkpatrick et al. (1990) presented the following chi-square statistic to test the good-
                                                   ˘
         ness of fit of the reduced covariance function to G:
            χ 2    = (g - X cˆ)′ V  (g˘ - X c)
                     ˘
                             ˆ -1
                                      ˆ
              (m-p)      s           s
                                                           ˘
         where m = t(t + 1)/2 is the number of degrees of freedom in G and p = (k(k + 1)/2 is the
         number of parameters being fitted. A significant result indicates that the model is
         inconsistent with the data, and a higher order of fit may be needed. For the beef cattle
                             2
                                                                         2
         example, the value of c  was 0.2231 with m = 6 and p = 3. This value of c  was not
         significant with three degrees of freedom and thus the reduced covariance function
                                        ˘
         was not significantly different from G.
            Another method of fitting a reduced-order CF, proposed by Mantysaari (1999),
         involved eigenvalue decomposition of the coefficient matrix. The largest k eigenvalues of
         ˆ
         C   in Eqn 9.9, for instance, are kept in a diagonal matrix (D ) and the matrix F replaced
                                                          a
                                               ˆ
         by the k corresponding eigenfunctions. Thus G   in Eqn 9.7 can be approximated as:
             ˆ
            G » F[v v  ... v ]D [v v  ... v ]′F′ = TD T′
                   1  2    k  a  1  2  k         a
                                        ˆ
         where the v  are the eigenvectors of C   corresponding to eigenvalues in D .
                   i                                                   a
            Similarly, if CF has been fitted to the environmental covariance matrix, a similar
         reduction can be carried as follows:
            R = FC F + Is e
                          2
                   p
              = F[v v  ... v ]D [v v  ... v ]′F′ + Is e = QD Q′ + Is e      (9.11)
                                                2
                                                              2
                   1  2    k  p  1  2  k               p
          154                                                             Chapter 9
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175