Page 109 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 109

88    PART I    The Biology and Pathogenesis of Cancer



          TABLE 4.5     Selected Observational Studies of Canine and Feline Cancers by Type of Exposure—cont’d
            Exposure    Main Findings                                     Strengths/Limitations
  VetBooks.ir  Pesticides

                        Any use of chemicals containing 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
                    63
            Hayes, 1991
                                                                            cases; high participation rates among cases and con-
                          positively associated with canine malignant lymphoma, compared with   Strengths: Complete ascertainment of newly diagnosed
                          no use. Lymphoma risk increased with greater number of applications   trols; collected extensive information on chemical use on
                          of 2,4-D–containing chemicals.                    lawns/yards (self-applied and commercially applied).
                                                                          Limitations: One control group composed of dogs with other
                                                                            cancers. note: This and other limitations were addressed
                                                                            in subsequent analyses.
            Glickman,   Residence location within one mile of a marsh (where chemicals    Strengths: Collected information on numerous sources
              1989 65     were used for mosquito control) positively associated with    of chemical exposure, including residential location to
                          canine TCC of the urinary bladder. Receiving flea dips more than    industries, pesticide use, flee/tick treatments.
                          two times/year versus no use was positively associated with TCC.  Limitations: 45% of control dogs had malignant neoplasia;
                                                                            information was not collected on individual dog exposure
                                                                            to the marsh or on specific chemicals used around the
                                                                            house/yard.
            Glickman,   Access versus no access to phenoxy herbicide–treated lawns/yards posi-  Strengths: Collected information on brand name and active
              2004 44     tively associated with TCC of the urinary bladder among    ingredients for household, lawn, and garden chemicals;
                          Scottish terriers. No association was observed for lawns/yards    results were specific for phenoxy herbicide exposure.
                          not treated with phenoxy herbicides.            Limitations: Limited statistical power to conduct subgroup
                                                                            analyses.
            Raghavan,   Use of topical flea/tick products (e.g., shampoos, dips, powders, sprays,   Strengths: Collected detailed information on use of flea/tick
              2004 111    and collars) not associated with TCC of the urinary bladder among    products (e.g., type, brand, pattern of use)
                          Scottish terriers.                              Limitation: 24% of control dogs had cancer; numbers for
                                                                            cases and controls were not presented by exposure
                                                                            level.
            Environmental Pollutants
            Bettini, 2010 112  Pulmonary anthracosis (high versus none) positively associated with   Strengths: Histologic confirmation of primary diagnosis of
                          canine lung cancer risk.                          lung cancer; exposure assessment determined by histo-
                                                                            logic scoring of anthracosis; strong biologic mechanism
                                                                            supporting the a priori hypothesis.
                                                                          Limitations: Small number of cases limited the statistical
                                                                            analyses.
            Marconato,   Living in geographic areas exposed to toxic waste positively associated   Strengths: Population-based study design, histologic
              2009 43     with canine cancer risk (all tumors and lymphoma), compared with    confirmation of cases; odds ratios were adjusted for age,
                          living in an unexposed area. No associations observed for canine    sex, and breed.
                          mast cell tumors, canine mammary cancer, or feline cancers.  Limitations: Same eligibility criterion (i.e., living at same
                                                                            address for 2 years before enrollment) was not applied
                                                                            to controls.
            Gavazza,    Living in an industrial neighborhood was positively associated with    Strengths: Histopathologic or cytologic confirmation of
              2001 66     canine lymphoma risk, compared with living in any other neighborhood.   cases; information was collected on potential confound-
                          Use or storage of paints and solvents was positively associated    ers.
                          with lymphoma risk, compared with no use of chemicals.  Limitations: Very low prevalence of exposed cases and
                                                                            controls; only univariate analyses were conducted.
            Bukowski,   Cumulative kerosene or coal heat exposure was positively associated    Strengths: High participation rate; covariate information
              1998 113    with sinonasal cancer risk.                       was compared between respondents and nonrespon-
                                                                            dents; histopathologic confirmation of cases.
                                                                          Limitations: Use of controls with cancer.
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114