Page 203 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 203

12


  VetBooks.ir


         Cancer Chemotherapy




         DANIEL L. GUSTAFSON AND DENNIS B. BAILEY







         General Principles of Cancer Chemotherapy                Processes in cell division not involving DNA replication are also

         Mechanism of Cancer Therapy                           targets for anticancer agents. The most prominent of these targets
                                                               is tubulin, with several classes of drugs having antitubulin activity.
         The use of chemical elixirs for the treatment of cancer can be traced   The mechanism of action of these agents involves either inhibit-
         through the medicinal customs and practices of multiple cultures.   ing the polymerization of tubulin or stabilizing the polymerized
         The modern use of pharmacologic agents to treat cancer began in   form so that depolymerization is blocked. The result of blocking
         the mid-1940s when Alfred Gilman and Louis Goodman showed   either of these processes is the inhibition of microtubule function
         the efficacy of nitrogen mustard in tumor-bearing mice, and these   in the dividing cell. Microtubule function is critical to progression
         results were quickly translated and verified in human patients.   through mitosis via spindle fiber formation and the separation of
         These results and the efforts of others such as Sydney Farber with   chromosome pairs into daughter cells. Blockade of this process by
         antifolates and George Hitchings and Gertrude Elion with purine   antitubulin agents has proved to be an effective strategy because
         analogs rapidly advanced the growing interest of treating cancer   cells blocked in this part of the cell cycle (M phase) can undergo
         with drugs. The beginning of a systematic screening program for   apoptosis, other mechanisms of cell death and loss of viability. 
         anticancer drugs at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 1955
         set the framework for cancer chemotherapy development in both   Terminology and Concepts
         the public and private sectors and led to the characterization of
         many of the agents still in clinical use today. 1,2   Terms that are related to the efficacy and toxicity of cancer che-
            The basis of anticancer drug activity is the targeting of dividing   motherapy are important concepts for understanding their
         cells through interference with processes involved in progression   pharmacologic activity. The therapeutic index for a given chemo-
         through the cell cycle. As shown in Fig. 12.1, the major classes   therapeutic agent is the ratio between the toxic dose and the thera-
         of drugs used to treat cancer work at various steps in the pro-  peutic dose for that drug. For most cytotoxic drugs used to treat
         cesses of DNA replication (S phase) and subsequent cell division    cancer, the therapeutic index is an abstract parameter because the
         (M phase). Another set of therapeutic agents, the signal transduc-  administered dose is based on the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
         tion inhibitors, work by interfering with the signaling processes   rather than dose response. The MTD is an empirically derived
         that trigger entry into the cell cycle and continuing cellular pro-  value that represents the highest dose of a given drug that can
         liferation. This newer class of agents is discussed in Chapter 15,   be administered with few patients experiencing unacceptable or
         Section B. DNA synthesis is a complicated process involving   irreversible adverse effects (AEs). MTD is initially derived from
         anabolic processes to create the purine and pyrimidine nucleo-  a limited population sample and then refined with additional
         tide triphosphates required for replication, unwinding of the tem-  clinical experience. This is an important concept in cancer drug
         plate DNA to provide access to the replication machinery, and   administration in that drug doses are generally based on this value
         the high-fidelity process of creating complementary strands. Anti-   rather than assessments of efficacy. A newer concept for drugs used
         cancer drugs may work at any of these steps, including the antime-  to treat cancer is the biologically effective dose (BED), based on a
         tabolites that inhibit anabolic processes required for providing the   measured response at a putative target or surrogate that is related
         nucleotide building blocks, topoisomerase inhibitors that interfere   to the mechanism of action of the agent. Determination of the
         with the enzymatic process of DNA unwinding, and alkylating/  BED is currently more related to the use of signal transduction
         DNA binding agents that can either act in a bifunctional man-  inhibitors and molecularly targeted agents; however, the concept
         ner to cross-link DNA through either interstrand or intrastrand   is not exclusive to these agents and this approach may be useful
         interactions blocking strand separation and template processing,   when applied to cytotoxic chemotherapy using dosing protocols
         or in a monofunctional manner interfering with the replication   not based on the MTD. Dose intensity (DI) is a measure of dose
         machinery through multiple mechanisms of altered binding and   per unit of time and thus allows comparisons between protracted
         base recognition. The resulting effects of interacting at these levels   and compacted dosing schedules. Comparisons of DI between,
         of DNA replication can include the generation of DNA strand   for example, every 3 weeks and every week dosing allows for deter-
         breaks, incomplete replication, and triggering of apoptotic signal-  mining whether the total dose of the drug or the DI relates to
         ing such that cell death is the ultimate result.      toxicity or therapeutic outcome and the effect that altering dosing



         182
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208