Page 278 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 278

CHAPTER 15  Molecular/Targeted Therapy of Cancer  257


           gene coding for ICP47 (ICP47 suppresses the immune response   with greater potency are developed, or used in combination with
           to the virus) has been removed. To date, increased survival or pro-  other treatments, then safety should remain a concern. One of
                                                           66
                                                                 the major issues may be the development of resistance through
           tection from metastasis has not been definitively demonstrated.
  VetBooks.ir  clinical studies. Recent pilot safety studies have been performed in   immune clearance. Although immunosuppressive therapy has
             In veterinary oncology, there have been a number of limited
                                                                 been suggested as part of the treatment with OVs, this should be
           dogs using systemically delivered recombinant oncolytic reovirus   considered with caution relating to both safety and ensuring that
           and vesicular stomatitis virus. 67,68  This demonstrated the feasibil-  the optimal performance of the virus is not blocked.  
                                                                                                         65
           ity and safety of this approach and opens the door to future studies
           to demonstrate efficacy in the clinical setting. A cautionary note,   Conclusions
           however, is that the majority of dogs in the United States and
           Europe are vaccinated against some viruses such as canine adeno-  Gene therapy promises a completely new approach to the treat-
           virus and these types of vectors may not be able to overcome host   ment of cancer and represents an emerging area of therapeutics.
           immunity with long-term treatments. 1,69              It has suffered over the past 20 years as clinical trials in human
                                                                 medicine have not delivered what they had originally promised.
           Safety Considerations in Gene Therapy                 However, many of these studies were conducted in patients with
                                                                 high-grade or end-stage disease and many studies were conducted
           One of the major considerations in gene therapy revolves around   prematurely without refining the delivery technologies. Clearly,
           issues of safety, in particular the safety of the vectors used for gene   there are a number of technical issues such as safety surrounding
           delivery. In 1999, gene therapy suffered a major setback with the   the delivery and efficiency of the vectors that need to be resolved
           death of a patient as a direct result of adenovirus gene therapy.   before gene therapy becomes established clinical practice. Despite
           Problems associated with vector delivery include inappropriate   gene therapy being very much in its infancy, the field is advancing
           inflammatory responses caused by vector delivery (e.g., adenovi-  at a rapid rate and resent successes have given the field a signifi-
           ruses), the generation of replication-competent viruses (although   cant optimistic boost. A number of clinical trials have begun in
           this is unlikely with new generation vectors), and insertional   companion animals, and products are in development for clinical
           mutagenesis caused by integrating viruses (e.g., retroviruses). 1  application. However, although these treatments would appear to
             Until recently, many gene therapy trials had utilized retroviral   be powerful in preclinical models, it is likely that their greatest
           vectors for gene delivery. There are many advantages to using ret-  benefit will be in the management of patients with minimal disease
           roviruses as outlined in Table 15.1; however, retroviruses are also   states. Thus gene therapy will probably have its greatest advantage
           associated with serious diseases of domestic animals and the use   not as a stand-alone treatment but as an adjunct to more conven-
           of these in gene therapy poses a risk of insertional mutagenesis   tional therapies such as surgery, RT, or chemotherapy. 
           and/or the production of replication-competent viruses during
           the manufacturing process. Realistically, insertional mutagenesis
           leading to a malignant transformation is an unlikely event because   SECTION B: SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
           cancer is a multistep process. In fact, there may be a greater risk   AND CANCER
           of malignant transformation from external beam RT than from
           the use of retroviruses to treat cancer. The production of replica-
           tion-competent retroviruses during the production process would   CHERYL A. LONDON
           also be unlikely because of the rigorous testing that is required
           before clinical application. Many of these issues are resolving with   In normal cells, signals are generated that begin at the outside of
                                             1
           the development of new generation vectors.  As an example, in   the cell and are transmitted through the cytoplasm to the nucleus,
           the use of retroviruses and to prevent insertional mutagenesis in   regulating cell growth, differentiation, survival, and death. Several
           normal tissues, one group recently described the use of zinc fin-  components of cellular signal transduction pathways are typically
           ger nucleases (engineered DNA-editing enzymes) that allows the   dysregulated in cancer cells, resulting in uncontrolled cell growth
                                                        69
           insertion of DNA to a site of choice within the genome.  This   and thereby contributing to tumorigenesis. Because many tumors
           adds a further level of safety in a high-risk procedure.  have similar alterations in signal transduction components, these
             One might imagine that the delivery of naked DNA may offer   have become promising targets for therapeutic intervention. This
           a safer alternative. However, all of the potential safety issues using   section focuses primarily on the role of a particular group of sig-
           this technology are still not fully answered. These include poten-  nal transducers called protein kinases, their role in normal cells,
           tial risks of autoimmunity and also the actual fate of the DNA   the mechanisms by which they contribute to tumorigenesis, and
           when it has been delivered to the patient; in the case of the former,   the use of agents designed to inhibit them when they become
           however, there would appear to be no evidence of autoimmunity   dysfunctional. 
           being a problem in preclinical models.
             One of the most exciting developments in cancer gene therapy   Protein Kinases and Normal Cells
           is the use of conditionally replicating OVs. However, the safety of
           these vector systems needs special consideration as many of them   Protein kinases play critical roles in normal cell signal transduc-
           in their native form could pose a risk to both human and animal   tion, acting to tightly regulate cellular processes such as growth
           health. Despite this, published trial data have not demonstrated   and differentiation. These proteins work through phosphoryla-
           any significant safety issues. Local delivery has been associated in   tion; that is, they bind adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and use it
           human medicine with mild flulike symptoms, which have resolved   to add phosphate groups to key residues on themselves (a process
           with symptomatic treatment with paracetamol/acetaminophen.    called autophosphorylation) and on other molecules, thereby stim-
                                                            65
           In addition, OVs do not reach a maximum tolerated dose (MTD),   ulating a downstream signal inside the cell. This process typically
           mainly because of a high tolerance for the virus. However, as OVs   occurs in response to external signals generated by growth factors
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283