Page 219 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 219

191

  VetBooks.ir







             Box B3


               Elephant Cognition: An Overview
             Sarah L. Jacobson and   Joshua M. Plotnik




             Although elephant behaviour has been     2006). Two of the first experimental studies
             studied extensively through decades of eth-  on elephants addressed their capacity to
             ological field research (Douglas‐Hamilton   make visual discriminations (Rensch 1957;
             and Douglas‐Hamilton 1975; Poole 1996;   Nissani et al. 2005), but the results indicated
             Moss et  al. 2011), far less is known about   that their capacity for visual discrimination
             elephant cognition, especially when com-  varied across subjects. More recently, a group
             pared to our knowledge of widely studied   of wild elephants demonstrated their ability
             non‐human primate cognition (Byrne et al.   to classify ethnic groups visually by garment
             2009; Irie and Hasegawa 2009; Byrne and   colour (Bates et al. 2007). It appears elephants
             Bates 2011). However, recently, researchers   can use vision to make decisions, but proba-
             studying  wild  and  captive  elephants  have   bly not nearly as much as they use olfaction
             made strides in better understanding the   and audition (Plotnik et al. 2014).
             social and physical cognition of the family   Elephants produce many vocalisations
             Elephantidae, primarily focusing on African   across a broad acoustic range and have sensi-
             savanna  elephants  (Loxodonta  africana)   tive systems for detecting these vocalisations
             and Asian elephants (Elephas maximas).   (Poole et al. 1988; Langbauer 2000; O’Connell‐
                                                      Rodwell 2007). Specifically, African elephants
                                                      have demonstrated that they can discriminate
               Sensory Modalities                     between familiar and unfamiliar infrasonic
             of Elephant Cognition                    vocalisations (O’Connell‐Rodwell et al. 2007)
                                                      and recognise the vocalisations of individuals
             Investigating the cognition of species that are   over  distances  greater  than  1 km  (McComb
             evolutionarily distinct from humans is a   et al. 2003). African elephants are also able to
             challenge, as the variability in sensory per-  discriminate between ethnicities, genders,
             spectives across such species must be    and ages of humans from vocal cues (McComb
             accounted for in experimental design (Plotnik   et al. 2014). Elephants possess sophisticated
             et al. 2013). Much emphasis within the field   olfactory systems as well (Shoshani et  al.
             of animal cognition has been on the design of   2006). Studies of elephant olfactory discrimi-
             experiments that rely on an animal’s capacity   nation abilities have demonstrated their abil-
             for using vision in the decision‐making pro-  ity to distinguish between ethnic groups
             cess, probably due to the field’s focus on   (Bates  et  al. 2007) and  discrete chemical
             largely visual animals such as primates     compounds (Rizvanovic et al. 2013; Schmitt
             (Tomasello and Call 1997) and birds (Emery   et  al. 2018),  to match different  odours  in a



             Zoo Animal Learning and Training, First Edition. Edited by Vicky A. Melfi, Nicole R. Dorey, and Samantha J. Ward.
             © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2020 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224