Page 229 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 229

Box B4  Marine Mammal Training  201

  VetBooks.ir  development of a welfare assessment index   Hosey, G. (2008). A preliminary model of
               for captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops
                                                        human–animal relationships in the zoo.
               truncatus). Animal Welfare 24 (3): 267–282.
                                                        105–127.
             Colitz, C.M., Saville, W.J., Renner, M.S. et al.   Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109 (2):
               (2010). Risk factors associated with cataracts   Kuczaj, S.A. II and Xitco, M.J. Jr. (2002). It takes
               and lens luxations in captive pinnipeds in   more than fish: the psychology of marine
               the United States and the Bahamas. Journal   mammal training. International Journal of
               of the American Veterinary Medical       Comparative Psychology 15: 186–200.
               Association 237 (4): 429–436.          Marineland (2018). A history of adventure.
             Davis, C. and Harris, G. (2006). Redefining our   https://marineland.net/our‐history
               relationships with the animals we train –   (accessed 7 October 2018).
               leadership and posture. Soundings 31 (4): 6–8.  Mehrkam, L.R. and Dorey, N.R. (2014). Is
             Dorey, N.R., Mehrkam, L.R., and Tacey, J.   preference a predictor of enrichment
               (2015). A method to assess relative preference   efficacy in Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis
               for training and environmental enrichment in   nigra)? Zoo Biology 33: 275–284.
               captive wolves (Canis lupus and Canis lupus   Mehrkam, L.R. and Dorey, N.R. (2015).
               arctos). Zoo Biology 34 (6): 513–517.    Preference assessments in the zoo: keeper
             Fay, C. and Miller, L.J. (2015). Utilizing scents   and staff predictions of enrichment
               as environmental enrichment: preference   preference. Zoo Biology 34: 418–430.
               assessment and application with Rothschild   Starkhammar, J., Amundin, M., Olsén, H., et al.
               giraffe. Animal Behavior and Cognition 2:   (2007). Acoustic touch screen for dolphins,
               285–291. https://doi.org/10.12966/       first application of ELVIS – an echo‐location
               abc.08.07.2015                           visualization and interface system.
             Fernandez, E.J., Dorey, N., and Rosales‐Ruiz, J.   Proceedings of the 4th International
               (2004). A two choice preference assessment   Conference on Bio‐Acoustics, Loughborough,
               with five cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus   UK (10–12 April 2007). Institute of
               oedipus). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare   Acoustics, 29(3): 63–68.
               Science 7 (3): 163–169. https://doi.   Ward, S.J. and Melfi, V. (2013). The
               org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0703_2          implications of husbandry training on zoo
             Gaalema, D.E., Perdue, B.M., and Kelling, A.S.   animal response rates. Applied Animal
               (2011). Food preference, keeper ratings, and   Behaviour Science 147: 179–185.
               reinforcer effectiveness in exotic animals:   Ward, S.J. and Melfi, V. (2015). Keeper‐animal
               the value of systematic testing. Journal of   interactions: differences between the
               Applied Animal Welfare Science 14: 33–41.  behaviour of zoo animals affect
             Gage, L.J. (2011). Captive pinniped eye    stockmanship. PLoS ONE 10 (10): e0140237.
               problems: we can do better. The Journal of   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
               Marine Animals and Their Ecology 4: 25–28.  pone.0140237.
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234