Page 287 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 287

10.4  Animal Welfare Considerations  259

  VetBooks.ir  2008). First seen being  performed by ravens   familiar tasks with individuals with whom they
                                                      know. However, benefits were only seen when
             and crows at a bird show in Texas, the
             Australian bird trainer, Claudia Bianchi,
                                                      shows (maximum of four per day) and faecal
             developed a training programme for a galah   birds participated in a moderate number of
             (Eolophus roseicapilla) and white‐tailed black   corticosteroid levels were significantly higher
             cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus spp.). Although   when show numbers peaked.
             corvids were considered potentially more   Findings in a range of species handled for
             suitable for this routine, Taronga Zoo wanted   educational purposes (hedgehogs, red‐tailed
             to utilise existing birds from their collection   hawks, and armadillos) also revealed a strong
             (Host 2008), and continue to involve mainly   correlation between elevated faecal glucocor-
             native Australian birds in their show.   ticoid metabolite concentrations, as well as
               The birds selected had previously received   increased  undesirable  behaviours,  and
             basic conditioning training, but had not experi-  increased amount of handling (Baird et  al.
             enced any shaping or training of complex   2016). Welfare concerns were also identified
             behaviours (Host 2008). In order to   perform   by Taronga Zoo in their trained parrots.
             the donation‐collecting activity, the birds   Therefore the zoo no longer offers the interac-
             would need to sit on the donation box and   tive money collection activity described
             accept money in their beak (Host 2008) with-  above, despite positive benefits for conserva-
             out attempting to swallow the money (or bite   tion donations (Kemp et al., submitted). This
             the donor!). Desensitisation to the show envi-  highlights the need to fully evaluate both the
             ronment (crowds of up to 1000 people, music,   animal‐ and visitor‐responses achieved by any
             and the free flying presence of other trained   non‐husbandry or health‐related training
             birds), was also necessary (Host 2008). This lat-  activity. Nonetheless, it is also important to
             ter aspect proved to be the most challenging,   note that faecal cortisol provides a cumulative
             especially since the show programme changes   indicator of adrenal gland activity and there-
             over time with new birds being introduced   fore does not provide an immediate indication
             (Host 2008). Another significant issue was the   of acute stress levels in the animal. As such,
             tendency of one of the birds to throw the money   research is currently being conducted using
             away after picking it up (Host 2008), which was   salivary cortisol from sea lions to elucidate
             obviously  contrary  to the  message  that the   hormone levels before and immediately after
             show was attempting to convey. Although the   public performances (Bloom P., pers. comm.).
             birds were also slower to collect and cache the   Housing environment (enclosure size and
             money than the   corvids witnessed in Texas,   substrate depth) was also linked to welfare
             they were considered successfully trained over   indicators (Baird et al. 2016), whereby the con-
             the course of 10 months (Host 2008).     ditions under which ‘programme’ or  ‘education’
                                                      animals are housed may not be as optimal as
                                                      ‘exhibit’ or ‘breeding’ animals. Many UK zoos
             10.4   Animal Welfare                    include collections of animals suitable for pub-
             Considerations                           lic contact. Various zoo guidelines provide
                                                      advice on which species are best for handling
             Research using faecal cortisol levels suggests   and whilst this is beneficial in terms of welfare,
             that birds used in public performances may be   it restricts the types of animals which can be
             less stressed than birds who are simply   used and does not always consider educational
               displayed to the public in exhibits (Robson   value (DEFRA 2012; EAZA Felid TAG 2017;
             2002). This is potentially due to the positive   European Association of Zoos and Aquaria
             reinforcement by trainers, meaning that the   2014). The exception to this is the World
             animals experience shorter periods of boredom   Association of Zoo and Aquarium’s guidance
             or inactivity, and the fact that, whilst on view to   on the use of animals in  presentations, in
             a large audience, the birds are performing   which an educational  component is listed as
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292