Page 288 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 288

260  10  Making Training Educational for Zoo Visitors

  VetBooks.ir  mandatory (World Association of Zoos and   been reported in a number of studies
                                                     (Ballantyne et  al. 2007; Hacker and Miller
            Aquariums 2003). Nonetheless, many of the
            handling collections include animals com-
                                                     linked to conservation intent (Hacker and
            monly kept as pets such as corn snakes.   2016; Reading and Miller 2007), and even
            Although  handling  an  animal,  regardless  of   Miller 2016). Presentations or performances
            species, may have benefits such as reducing   using  trained  or  conditioned  animals  offer
            phobias and increasing concern for the spe-  experiential  learning  opportunities.  By
            cies, the ease of availability of such animals   increasing visitor engagement through the
            may increase public desire for keeping   assimilation of education within an entertain-
            such  animals as pets; missing the overall   ing or enjoyable experience, these pro-
              messages of biodiversity and conservation.   grammes align with classical learning theories
            Furthermore, individuals who handle animals   such as Piaget’s theory of discovery and play,
            in these sessions are often praised for their   and Vygotsky’s social constructivism theory
            ‘bravery’ at touching the animals, which rein-  (Piaget 1973; Vygotsky 1978). This combina-
            forces concepts that the animal is dangerous.   tion of  affective  and cognitive learning is
            Some collections such as Chester Zoo (UK)   often key to zoo mission statements. The aim
            have  opted  to  move  away  from  live  animal   of many zoo education programmes is typi-
            handling on welfare grounds, as handling ani-  cally to enable visitors to develop a concern
            mals are often kept in different conditions to   for the natural world, and ultimately to
            the other animals in a collection. However,   increase their commitments towards its
            they do encourage visitors to collect and han-    preservation (Kellert 1996). To this end, inter-
            dle wild animals in their grounds such as   actions with animals can create a more
            invertebrate species (Bazley 2018). This indi-    personalised education experience in which
            cates a shared belief that first hand contact   conservation messages may be better
            with animals is a crucial part of understand-  received, potentially achieving increased per-
            ing nature and echoes ideas of learning   sonal meaning or relevance, which is consid-
            through discovery and touch (Piaget 1973).   ered an important dimension to learning in a
            There needs to be a balance between deliver-  zoo setting (Falk and Dierking 2000). This
            ing  high  impact  educational  activities  with   emotional  response  to  experiences  is  often
            conservation value, and maintaining high   associated with increased learning, empathy,
            animal welfare standards. This may not be   or connectedness. In zoos, the ability to see
            easily achieved in practice, especially since   animals performing active behaviours, as well
            animal welfare must be assessed on an indi-  as having ‘up‐close’ encounters with the ani-
            vidual scale, whilst education and conserva-  mals (Figure 10.6) has been linked to increased
            tion impact is typically measured on much   positive affective responses and predicted
            larger, population‐level scales. However, by   their ability to make meaningful connections
            prioritising the needs of the individual ani-  to concepts (Luebke et al. 2016). Self‐reported
            mals, and developing training, housing, and   emotional  arousal was also  highest for  visi-
            display methods in‐keeping with these needs,   tors observing animals performing active
            it is possible to deliver more sincere, legiti-  behaviours such as during a bird of prey flying
            mate conservation‐education messages.    presentation or lion feeding event (Smith
                                                     et  al. 2008b). Moreover, this self‐reported
                                                     data was supported by findings for changes in
            10.5   Impact on Visitor Learning,       the heart and respiration rates of these visi-
            Attitude, and Behaviour                  tors, indicating a physiological response to
                                                     these zoo experiences.
            As recently reviewed (Whitehouse‐Tedd     It follows that animal training presenta-
            et al. 2018), the ability of animal presentations   tions, as well as the use of trained animals in
            to elicit an increased knowledge retention has   zoo education presentations, have a role to
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293