Page 1182 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 1182

1120  Section 10  Renal and Genitourinary Disease

            ureter makes even small stone fragments problematic   An indwelling ureteral stent is composed of a flexible
  VetBooks.ir  and even in dogs there is risk of ureteral obstruction after   polymeric compound that has a loop at each end, which
                                                              help maintain the stent’s position throughout the ureter,
            shock wave therapy of nephroliths. The likelihood of
            ureteral obstruction following shock wave therapy can be
                                                              bladder. Ureteral stents may be placed endoscopically,
            limited if a ureteral stent is implanted at the time of the   with one loop in the renal pelvis and the other in the
            shock wave treatment. Extracorporeal shock wave litho­  though this is most feasible in female dogs where a rigid
            tripsy is a consideration for dogs and appears well toler­  cystoscope and a comparatively larger urethra facilitate
            ated, though transient hematuria or shock wave‐induced   the procedure. For cats, the stents are typically placed via
            pancreatitis may occur.                           an  open abdominal  procedure  with fluoroscopic  guid­
             In dogs, surgical ureterotomy for an obstructive uro­  ance.  The  stent may  be  placed  antegrade  through  the
            lith is typically associated with a favorable outcome in   renal parenchyma after needle access into the renal pel­
            the hands of an experienced surgeon. In cats, however,   vis, or retrograde through a cystotomy incision and visu­
            major complications were reported in a significant num­  alization of the ureterovesicular orifices. Reports of
            ber of the cases, with a mortality rate of 18% in the larg­  ureteral stents in both dogs and cats suggest successful
            est series from a highly experienced center. In light of   implantation in greater than 95% of cases with low com­
            these figures, alternatives to surgical ureterolith removal   plication or reintervention rates. The cat shown in
            have been developed in recent years, including ureteral   Figure 122.10 presented with a BUN of 280 mg/dL (refer­
            stenting (Figure  122.10) and subcutaneous ureteral   ence interval, 13–30 mg/dL) and a creatinine of 20.5 mg/
            bypass (Figure 122.11).                           gL (reference interval, 0.9–2.1 mg/dL) and complete























            Figure 122.10  Radiographic images from a cat with complete right ureteral obstruction secondary to a circumcaval ureter and
            ureterolithiasis. A double‐pigtail ureteral stent has been implanted in the obstructed right ureter to restore urine flow. Note that the left
            kidney is severely shrunken and small.






















            Figure 122.11  Radiographic images from a cat with a subcutaneous ureteral bypass system. The system includes a nephrostomy tube
            and a cystostomy tube connected to a dual‐lumen vascular port that is sutured to the body wall under the ventral skin.
   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187