Page 1242 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 1242

1180  Section 10  Renal and Genitourinary Disease

              interchangeable filters and software has provided the   dogs and cats is approximately 50% with the use of inter-
  VetBooks.ir  capability to perform this procedure with devices pri-  mittent hemodialysis. When considering all possible
                                                                etiologies, choice of modality does not appear to dramati-
            marily designed for renal replacement therapy. In the
            past several years, reports of therapeutic plasma
                                                              injury treated with dialysis, such as leptospirosis in dogs
            exchange performed for the treatment of diseases such   cally affect survival rate. Certain etiologies of acute kidney
            as myasthenia gravis and immune‐mediated hemolytic   and ureteral obstructions in cats, have higher survival
            anemia have appeared in the veterinary literature, her-  rates, reaching 80–90%. In contrast, the prognosis for
            alding a new era in the evaluation of this modality for the   acute kidney injury secondary to ethylene glycol intoxica-
            treatment of immune‐mediated diseases.            tion is poor, with only 20% of dialysis patients regaining
                                                              sufficient renal function to allow discontinuation of
                                                              dialysis.
              Availability of Dialysis and Prognosis            While the current overall success rate for treatment
            for Dialysis Patients                             of acute kidney injury with dialysis appears disappoint-
                                                              ing, closer evaluation of the situation provides cause for
            The veterinary community has witnessed exponential   optimism. The survival rates achieved in veterinary
            growth  in the  number of  facilities  offering  dialysis for   medicine are similar to those achieved in human medi-
            small animal patients. Peritoneal dialysis requires equip-  cine. This accomplishment is likely due, in large part, to
            ment that is readily available, and this modality is per-  the etiologic differences between human and veterinary
            formed in many emergency and specialty hospitals that   acute kidney injury. Human acute kidney injury most
            offer 24‐hour care. Effective implementation of intermit-  commonly arises as a complication of disorders (e.g.,
            tent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement   sepsis, advanced cardiac disease) that alone carry a
            therapy is limited to hospitals that not only have the   poor prognosis.  Therefore, when acute kidney injury
            proper equipment but also employ properly trained indi-  does occur, the likelihood of a poor outcome is multi-
            viduals. Nonetheless, due to the low cost and ease of   plied. In veterinary medicine, however, many dialysis
            acquisition of the necessary equipment, many veterinary   candidates presented for acute kidney injury secondary
            facilities now offer intermittent hemodialysis and con-  to leptospirosis or select intoxications have no preexist-
            tinuous renal replacement therapy.                ing co‐morbid conditions that may affect prognosis.
             Despite the paucity of literature available describing   Therefore, if the potential benefit of dialysis is recog-
            outcome, it appears that the prognosis for veterinary   nized early, and these patients are treated with dialysis
            patients treated with dialysis is variable, and dependent   prior to the onset of severe complications, there is the
            on the underlying disease etiology, severity of illness, and   potential for the veterinary community to significantly
            co‐morbid conditions. In cases of acute kidney injury of   improve the current success rate for treatment of acute
            any etiology, the survival to hospital discharge for both   kidney injury.


              Further Reading


            Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, et al. Fluid     acute‐on‐chronic renal failure: 33 cases (2002–2006). J
              accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function   Vet Emerg Crit Care 2008; 18: 13.
              in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Kidney   Eatroff AE, Langston CE, Chalhoub S, et al.Long‐term
              Int 2009; 76:422–7.                               outcome of cats and dogs with acute kidney injury
            Cooper RL, Labato MA. Peritoneal dialysis in cats with   treated with intermittent hemodialysis: 135 cases
              acute kidney injury: 22 cases (2001–2006). J Vet Intern   (1997–2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241: 1471–8.
              Med 2011; 25: 14–19.                            Langston CE. Hemodialysis In: Bartges J, Polzin DJ, eds.
            Diehl SH, Seshadri R. Use of continuous renal replacement   Nephrology and Urology of Small Animals. Chichester,
              therapy for treatment of dogs and cats with acute or   UK: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2011, pp. 255–85.
   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247