Page 49 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 49

2.4  Spatial Learning, Navigation, and Migration  21

  VetBooks.ir  nuts  (Ottoni and Mannu 2001) and black‐  insects or alleviate itching from insect bites;
                                                      toss sand or dirt in threats or play; and
             handed spider monkeys also engage in tool
             use with detached sticks in self‐directed
                                                      bodies for thermoregulation and cooling
             behaviours (Lindshield and Rodrigues 2009).  siphon mud through their trunk onto their
               There are several examples of tool use in   (Chevalier‐Skolnikoff and Liska 1993).
             free‐ranging non‐primate terrestrial species   Chimpanzees used leaves to aid in collect-
             that have been documented as well. A classic   ing and drinking water (Sousa et al. 2009).
             example is the use of stones by Egyptian vul-  Boinski (1988) reported observations of a
             tures (Neophron percnopterus) to break open   white‐faced capuchin using a large tree
             the shells of ostrich eggs (van Lawick‐Goodall   branch as a club to attack a venomous snake.
             and van Lawick‐Goodall  1966). California   Many more examples of a variety of tool use
             sea otters (Enhydra lutris) position stones   in wild animals exist both in the scientific
             against another stone or on their chest while   literature as well in anecdotal reports.
             supine and pound mussels repeatedly against
             them in order to open the mussels (Hall and
             Schaller 1964). Tool use has also been dem-  2.4   Spatial Learning,
             onstrated experimentally in many corvids,   Navigation, and Migration
             including New Caledonian crows and ravens,
             which bend hooks from leaf stems to obtain   Another way animals learn from their envi-
             larvae from logs (Bluff et al. 2010).    ronment is how to move through it. To date,
               Although the social behaviour of aquatic spe-  most experimental demonstrations of how
             cies can be particularly difficult to study in the   animals use maps and landmarks have been
             wild, there are several reports of tool use in   conducted in laboratory settings with rats,
             marine mammals and fishes as well. Free‐rang-  meadow voles (Gaulin and Fitzgerald 1989),
             ing bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) are par-  and insects, and even in species with very
             ticularly well‐represented in observations of   large home ranges. Interestingly, male
             tool use, with sponging being the primary tool   meadow voles (which have home ranges up
             (Krützen et al. 2005), where a dolphin breaks a   to ten times larger than females) were supe-
             marine sponge off the seafloor and wears it   rior to female voles on spatial learning tasks.
             over its closed rostrum to apparently probe
             into the substrate for fish. South American   2.4.1  Optimal Foraging
             fresh water stingrays use water to extract food
             from an experimental test apparatus (Kuba   Wild animals of all species need to be able
             et al. 2010). It is quite clear that tool use can be   to  successfully navigate adaptively through
             highly adaptive for foraging purposes in many   their  environment  for  a variety  of reasons,
             species of distinct taxonomic groups.    but perhaps the most essential reason is to
               In addition to different species’ biology   locate food. But it is not enough to know
             and characteristics, certain features of an   simply the location of food; it is also vital to
             animal’s habitat can facilitate tool use as   be able to obtain food efficiently in the wild.
             well, such as the availability of potential   One of the best‐known concepts in animal
             tools or the presence of barriers to a site   behaviour and learning is optimal foraging
             with additional resources. Western gorillas   theory (OFT), which comes from influences
             have been observed to use branches as walk-  of ethology, ecology, evolution, psychology,
             ing sticks to test water deepness in elephant   and economics (Dugatkin 2013). OFT is a
             pools. African elephants (Loxodonta afri­  mathematical theory to predict  various
             cana) have also been observed to use a vari-  aspects of animal foraging behaviour under
             ety of tools in the wild; elephants will swat   certain conditions (Sih and Christensen
             and scratch their bodies with vegetation   2001). Because animals have to make a num-
             held in their trunks, possibly to remove   ber of decisions about foraging under a given
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54