Page 53 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 53

2.5  Learning from Others: Social Cognition and Learning  25

  VetBooks.ir  way  dangerous.  Predators learn to discrimi-  stringent criteria. They both involve sharing
                                                      information  between  conspecifics  and
             nate and subsequently avoid prey with these
             warning  colours (Lindström et  al. 2001;
                                                      species. Evidence of these types of social
             Svádová et al. 2009).                    sometimes also across generations within a
               It is, of course, not only predators who   learning as it occurs in the wild may provide
             benefit from learning about how to acquire   evidence for cultures in the animal kingdom.
             and process food. Some of the earliest evi-
             dence for social learning came from experi-  2.5.5  Difficulties in Determining
             ments showing how wild and laboratory rats   Learning Type
             gain  information  about  the  palatability  and
             toxicity of unfamiliar foods by observing oth-  Cetaceans are also known to be highly imita-
             ers (Galef et  al. 1984). As opportunistic   tive and capable of social learning, both in
             omnivores, rats can  thus  learn  quickly  to   the wild and in captivity (Krützen et al. 2005).
             avoid dangerous novel foods without having   Killer whales (Orcinus orca) capture seal
             to sample them all themselves. Opportunities   pups by intentionally stranding on breeding
             to learn about what items can be safely eaten,   beaches off the coast of Argentina (Guinet
             and how food items should be processed   and Bouvier 1995). Adult females modified
             prior to eating, can come from observing   their stranding behaviour in the presence of
             others, but  also  from being provided  with   naive juvenile calves, suggesting that females
             samples of different foods to practice with, as   were providing the calves with opportunities
             for example in gorilla parenting (G. gorilla)   to observe various stranding techniques that
             (Nowell and Fletcher 2008; see Figure  2.3),   could be used to capture seal pups. Guinet
             and encountering food items previously pro-  (1991) suggested that killer whale calves
             cessed by others, for example capuchins C.   developed intentional stranding foraging
             apella finding bamboo segments previously   skills  through  imitation  of  the  successful
             opened to extract beetle larvae by other   hunting behaviours of their mothers (or
             members of the group (Gunst et al. 2008).  other relatives). Dolphins have been shown
               Apart from finding food and avoiding   to copy the actions of another dolphin for a
             becoming food, the other main preoccupation   food reward but can do so even when they
             for wild animals is to reproduce. Successful   are blindfolded (Jaakkola et al. 2010). Some
             reproduction involves finding and selecting   have suggested that the observer dolphin
             appropriate mates, engaging in copulation,   may accomplish this by using the sound
             and promoting the survival of  offspring. A   produced by the motions of the other dol-
             good example of the role of learning in this   phin or perhaps through vocal communica-
             comes from studies of sexual imprinting,   tion occurring between the dolphins (but
             where young animals learn the characteristics   outside the range of human hearing).
             of potential mates (such as species‐member-  Horner and Whiten (2005) investigated
             ship), but also who to avoid mating with   emulation in wild‐born chimpanzees from
             (because of genetic relatedness), and thus   an African sanctuary and compared their
             develop sexual preferences. Thus mate choice   behaviour to three‐ to four‐year‐old children
             and  subsequent  species  divergence  can  be   who observed a human demonstrator use a
             influenced by learned preferences (Irwin and   tool to retrieve a reward from both a clear
             Price 2001; Witte and Nöbel 2011).       and an opaque puzzle‐box. In the opaque
                                                      condition, it was impossible to differentiate
             2.5.4  Imitation, Emulation,             between the relevant and irrelevant parts of
             and Cultural Transmission                the demonstration, whereas, with the clear
                                                      puzzle‐box, it was possible to differentiate
             Imitation and emulation are also considered   between the relevant and irrelevant responses
             types of social  learning, albeit  with  more   made  by  the  demonstrator  necessary  to
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58