Page 64 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 64

36  3  The Ultimate Benefits of Learning

  VetBooks.ir  3.2   Survival Value of
            Learned Behaviours


            As Tinbergen himself stated ‘the ultimate test
            of survival value [of a behaviour] is survival
            itself,  survival  in  the  natural  environment’
            (Tinbergen 1963, p. 423). Animals evolve
            cognitive abilities, as they would physical or
            behavioural abilities, to deal with challenges
            faced in their wild ecological niches (Meehan
            and Mench 2007). One concern regarding
            zoo populations is that animals will lose their
            natural survival behaviours (sometimes
            referred to as traits or skills [Snyder et  al.
            1996]), or their ability to cope with these
            challenges (Hill and Broom 2009), due to not
            being subjected to natural phenomenon such
            as predation (see Chapter 12). Some survival
            behaviours are instinctive and we observe
            these behaviours regardless of whether ani-
            mals are wild or captive. For example in many
            primate species that conduct arboreal loco-
            motion ‘ventral clinging’ behaviour in infants
            is essential; offspring must cling tightly to
            their mothers as falling would undoubtedly   Figure 3.1  An example of the innate behaviour
            lead to death, and in many species we see this   displayed here by a newborn silvery gibbon
            instinctive clinging behaviour within hours   (Hylobates moloch); ventral clinging displayed by
            of birth (see Figure 3.1). However responding   newborn primates is essential to their survival.
            to predator alarm calls may require a much   Source: reproduced with permission of Chester Zoo.
            longer period of development, for example in
            wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygeryth-  Historically the distinction between instinc-
            rus) the production of vocalisations in the   tive or learned (nature vs nurture) behav-
            correct social context, and the correct   iours  has  been  controversial.  But it  is
            response to others’ vocalisations, gradually   generally considered that behavioural ontog-
            develops across the first four years of life   eny is a complex interplay between genetics
            (Seyfarth and Cheney 1986). Within the zoo-  and the environment (Barlow 1991), where
            logical environment we are uniquely placed   some behaviours arise from a greater contri-
            to evaluate the survival value of learned   bution of instinct or learning.
            behaviours through evaluating the success,   In order to  explore survival behaviours
            or indeed failure, of reintroduction attempts.   we conducted a brief review of recent
            A generalised benefit for zoo animals of   ( published since 2005–2018) studies on
            learning appropriate behaviours is that it will   reintroduction attempts. The review was
            aid reintroduction attempts as they require   conducted using results  from a ‘Web of
            animals to demonstrate suitable ‘survival   Science’ database search, where the search
            behaviours’ (Rabin 2003). We can therefore   terms were ‘reintroduction*behaviour’ and
            highlight the survival value of learning by   ‘reintroduction*learning’. Studies included
            focusing on which of these behaviours appear   in the review were: reintroductions of cap-
            to have a learned component, i.e. are less   tive born and raised individuals (from zoos
              reliant on instinct and instead the behav-  or other captive  environments); animal
            iour  develops within an animal’s lifetime.   translocations, as they represented animals
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69