Page 6 - Ice Breaker Article
P. 6

6



                     For the lecturer this online, interactive teaching provides a more rewarding and stimulating
                 teaching experience and as with the institution it allows a more efficient and effective teaching
                 pedagogy that increases the performance of all the constituent elements.

                     For  the  institution,  organisational  performance  will  increase  as  both  its  efficiency  and
                 effectiveness is enhanced for example, as these elements impact student retention will increase
                 as students respond to this higher quality pedagogic process.
                     Interactive,  multimedia  case  studies  are  still  in  their  infancy.  Construction  and  usage
                 parameters  have  not  yet  been  set  and  mistakes  are  still  being  made  at  fundamental  levels.
                 However, interaction has been highlighted as one of the keys to the success of Internet-based
                 distance  education  [Picciano,  2002].  Nevertheless,  this  e-resource  has  attempted  to  provide  a
                 richer  and  more  enjoyable  experience  for  the  user  by  extending  their  horizons  and  for  those
                 developing interactive case studies aid them through recording the processes associated with the
                 production of these business cases and their associated online interactive applications.

                     Developing interactive, multimedia business case studies does not happen in isolation. The
                 lecturer who builds case studies can no longer simply record a good story. He or she is driven by
                 a market whose customers now demand more in terms of information, analysis, and integration of
                 pedagogic linkages, timeliness of communication, ease of access and increased efficiency and
                 effectiveness.

                     In  seeking  to  achieve  this  electronic  delivery  the  lecturer  must  produce  not  only  the  most
                 effective  and  rewarding  learning  experience  possible  but  also  the  most  efficient.  However,  as
                 Zawacki-Richter  [Zawacki-Richter,  2005],  point  out  “A  frequently  encountered  reason  for  the
                 reserved  attitude  to  media-based  teaching  is  the  high  workload  associated  with  it.  Academic
                 reputations on the road to a professorship are acquired more by publishing research results and
                 attracting external funds than by good teaching. In contrast, 60% to 70% of the working hours of a
                 member  of  the  academic  staff  are  taken  up  with  teaching,  without  this  being  adequately
                 appreciated  in  proportion.  The  motivation  to  invest  even  more  work  in  teaching  is  at  times
                 correspondingly slight.”

                     This view is supported by Jenkins and Healey [Jenkins and Healey, 2005] when they observed
                 that

                     “Internationally there is a range of studies that show staff experience of institutions that give
                 limited recognition to quality teaching in promotion decisions [e.g. Ramsden et al., 1995] and mainly
                 emphasise research. There have been very few studies that have looked at whether institutions
                 provide rewards not only for better teaching or for better research but for demonstrations of the
                 integration between teaching and research” [Hattie and Marsh, 1996, p.529].

                     Lecturers may not have the motivation to devote the effort and time to climb the learning curves
                 of the software packages and systems requirements to produce online, interactive deliverables if
                 they are not perceived as route to academic advancement. This perception is dependent to a great
                 extent upon the actions of the institution and its administrative systems.

                     Diagrammatically  the  interactive  e-resource  case  study  may  be  represented  as  shown  in
                 Diagram 2: the E-Resource Case Study diagram.
                     At its heart is the case study which has been developed by the lecturer for use with the student
                 body. In the e-resource case study diagram the case study is depicted as being embedded in a
                 matrix  where  its  compass  points  depict  an  integrative  and  interdependent  relationship.  For
                 example, case development may be based on armchair case which is developed to demonstrate
                 an event, a piece of theory or a situational analysis. If a live case study is developed then this may
                 not just produce a case study it may provide an entry point into a business with the potential for a
                 more lasting relationship. Furthermore, this ‘live’ case study may lead to further research on the
                 target company, its industry or pedagogy. Case teaching is not about pedagogy per say, rather it
                 is partly about releasing the lecturer from the regurgitation of theory to the interpretation of such
                 through  a  more  dynamic  environmental  interface.  Likewise,  case  analysis  is  not  simply  about
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11