Page 7 - GP Spring 2020
P. 7

mandibular flexure and torsion, flexure of  comparing  different areas within in the   6. Pesun IJ. Intrusion of teeth in the combination
        the fixed partial denture metal framework,  arch such as anterior vs. posterior.  implant-to-natural-tooth fixed partial denture: A
        impaired  rebound memory, debris impac-                                   review of the theories. Journal of Prosthodon-
        tion, and the ratchet affect.  Overall, it was   Conclusion:              tics 1997;6:268-277.
                              6
        noted that the natural tooth receives high   The best treatment option for this patient   7. Ormianer Z, Brosh T, Laufer BZ, Shifman A.
        mechanical  stress because the implant  is   was for a single crown for his natural ca-  Strains recorded in a combined tooth-implant
        rigid  and, thus, conserves  energy, while   nine tooth #6, and a cantilever  bridge to   restoration: and in vivo study. Implant Dentistry
        the natural tooth absorbs the energy. With   connecting  the pontic #7 to the implant   2005;14:58-62.
        the persistent pressure being applied to the   abutment #8. In doing this, we were able   8. Lin CL, Chang SH, Wang JC. Finite element
        natural tooth, the PDL is constantly com-  to address all the concerns for our patient.   analysis  of biomechanical  interactions  of a
        pressing and will lose the elastic memory   We removed the non-restorable  fractured   tooth-implant splinting system for various bone
        and remodel itself to a new position that is   root #7 and the defective  old crown and   qualities. Chang Gung Medical Journal 2006;
                                                                                  29:143-153.
        less traumatic. This new position is often   recurrent decay on tooth #6. We restored
        apical to the original position.  Intrusion of   the missing space of tooth #7 with a can-  9.  Becker  W,  Becker  BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-
        the tooth in such a position could lead to   tilever  bridge connecting  to the implant   mubarak  S. Long-term  evaluation  of 282 im-
        stress on the bridge, further leading to frac-  #8, placed a crown on the canine tooth #6,   plants in maxillary  and mandibular molar
                                                                                  positions: a prospective study. Journal of Peri-
        ture and the other complications previously   and closed the open contact between teeth   odontology 1999; 70:896-901.
        discussed.                           #5 and 6. The treatment was completed in
                                             three months with minimal office visits and
        With limited support in the literature for an  the patient was very pleased.
        implant-to-natural tooth fixed partial den-                                           Dr. Philip Gentry is a Fellow
        ture, and concern for all the complications   References                              of The  Academy of Gener-
                                                                                              al  Dentistry, and has been
        noted, a cantilever bridge for #8-7 was   1. Davis SM, Plonka AB. Risks and benefits of   in private practice for 30
        used along with a separate crown on tooth   connecting  an  implant  and  natural  tooth.  Im-  years in Arlington, VA. He is
        #6. This was done to eliminate the forces   plant Dentistry 2014;23:253-257.          Dean’s Faculty, Clinical As-
        on tooth #6 and to prevent further tension   2. Rodrigues SJ. Tooth implant supported pros-  sistant  Professor, Advanced
        and  pressure on  surrounding  teeth.  Of   thesis:  literature  review.  Journal of Interdisci-  Education  in General Den-
        note, there have also been reports of more   plinary Dentistry 2013;3:143-150.  tistry at The University of Maryland School
        failures in the maxillary  arch compared   3. Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Young MPJ. Good occlusal   of Dentistry.
        to  mandibular  for tooth-implant  FPD.    practice in the provision of implant borne prosthe-
                                          4
                                                                                                      rd
        Specifically, Becker et al. reported 91.5%   ses. British Dental Journal 2002;192:79-88.  Ms. Erin Golueke  is a 3  year dental  stu-
        success in the mandibular arch compared   4. Al-Omiri  MK, Al-Masri  M, Alhijawi  MM,   dent at The University of Maryland School
        to 82.9% success in the maxillary arch .    Lynch E. Combined Implant and Tooth support:   of Dentistry.
                                          9
        It is believed that this could be due to the   and up to date comprehensive overview. Inter-
        difference in bone quality for maxillary vs.   national Journal of Dentistry 2017.
        mandibular  bone.  Overall,  more  research   5. Cohen SR, Orenstein JH. The use of attach-
        should be done to compare the effects for   ments in combination implant and natural-tooth
        maxillary  vs. mandibular implant-to-nat-  fixed  partial  denture: A  technical  report.  Int J
        ural-tooth fixed partial denture as well as   Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1994; 9:230-234.




                                    Congratulations to NYSAGD Board Members
                     Dr. Binod Verma and Dr. Stephen Akseizer as President and Secretary,
                                 respectively, of the Nassau County Dental Society























                         Drs. Binod Verma, Howard Baylarian, Joseph Brodsky, Stephen Akseizer and David Miller.

                                                                                     www.nysagd.org l Spring 2020 l GP 7
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12