Page 149 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 149

Social Interplay



                       In a formative context, Mass Trance as I have described it casts a shadow of interplay

               where  institutions  and  aligned  special  interests  of  the  Oligarchy  class  structure  conflict  over

               government power and capital allocation to direct or distract attention away from their controlling


               interests, whereas the imaginative framework shapes the preconceptions about potential forms of

               human interaction that are made possible in regards to citizen network formation, empowered


               comradery and shared vision of positive potentials.


                       Through this exchange made theoretically through evolved Community Conversations that


               harness greater participation and involvement, a formative context could counter the COGs further

               creating  and  sustaining  control  of  roles  and  ranks,  which  mold  conflict  over  the  mastery  of


               resources and the shaping of the ideas of social possibilities, identities and interests. Unless we as

               the public in dialogue can realize the formative context shaping our society and the challenges of

               overcoming the oppressive control of democracy from the oligarchs it is unrealistic for change, for


               example, if you include the organization of production through managers and laborers we also

               need to analyze the set of laws put in place that are administering capital, we need to question the


               structure of political representation as a dialogue analyzing the state of democracy and look at the

               legislative system in relation to the citizen, and as a social division of labor. (Unger, 2001)



                       False  necessity, or anti-necessitarian  social theory, is  a contemporary social theory that

               argues for the plasticity of social organizations and their potential to be shaped in new ways. The


               theory rejects the assumption that laws of change govern the history of human societies and limit

               human freedom. (Unger, 2004) It is a critique of "necessitarian" thought in conventional social

               theories (like liberalism or Marxism) which hold that parts of the social order are necessary or the


               result of the natural flow of history. The theory rejects the idea that human societies must be

                                                             130
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154