Page 34 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education
P. 34

The Role of the Professional Doctorate in Developing Professional Practice in STEM Subjects




                   Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid ap-
                   proach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative
                   Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
                   Fulton, J., Kuit, J., Sanders, G., & Smith, P. (2012a). The role of the Professional Doctorate in devel-
                   oping  professional  practice.  Journal  of  Nursing  Management,  20(1),  130–139.  doi:10.1111/j.1365-
                   2834.2011.01345.x PMID:22229909
                   Fulton, J., Kuit, J., Sanders, G., & Smith, P. (2012b). The Professional Doctorate: A Practical Guide for
                   Students and Supervisors. London: Palgrave.

                   Greene,  J.  C.,  Caracelli,  V.  J.,  &  Graham,  W.  F.  (1989).  Toward  a  conceptual  framework  for
                   mixed-method  evaluation  designs.  Educational  Evaluation  and  Policy  Analysis,  11(3),  255–274.
                   doi:10.3102/01623737011003255

                   Guthrie, J. (2009). The Case for a Modern Doctorate of Education Degree (Ed.D): Multipurpose Educa-
                   tion Doctorates No Longer Appropriate. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(1), 3-8.
                   Hadacek,  S.,  &  Carpenter,  D.  (1998).  Student  Perceptions  of  Nursing  Doctorates:  Similarities  and
                   Differences.  Journal  of  Professional  Nursing,  14(1),  14–21.  doi:10.1016/S8755-7223(98)80008-2
                   PMID:9473900
                   Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.
                   Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

                   Lester,  S.  (2004).  Conceptualising  the  Practitioner  Doctorate.  Studies  in  Higher  Education,  29(6),
                   757–770. doi:10.1080/0307507042000287249
                   Malfroy, J. (2005). Doctoral Supervision, workplace research, and changing pedagogic practices. Higher
                   Education Research & Development, 24(2), 165–178. doi:10.1080/07294360500062961

                   Olesen, H. S. (2001). Professional Identity as Learning Processes in Life Histories. Journal of Workplace
                   Learning, 13(7/8), 290–297. doi:10.1108/13665620110411076

                   Sanders, G. (2010). Towards a Model of Multi-organisational Work-based Learning: Developmental
                   networks as a mechanism for tacit knowledge transfer and exploration of professional identity. Learning
                   and Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 51–68.

                   Sanders, G., Kuit, J., Smith, P., & Fulton, J. (2012). Hidden Voices: Searching for Authenticity in Profes-
                   sional Doctorate Candidates. Third International conference on Professional Doctorates, UK Council
                   for Graduate Education.
                   Sanders, G., Kuit, J., Smith, P., Fulton, J. & Curtis, H. (2011). Identity, reflection and developmental
                   networks as processes in professional doctorate development. Work Based Learning e-Journal, 2(1),
                   113-134.
                   Smith, P., Curtis, H., Sanders, G., Kuit, J. & Fulton, J. (2011). Student perceptions of the professional
                   doctorate. Work Based Learning e-Journal, 2(1), 135-154.







                                                                                                           15
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39