Page 133 - 马佛青55周年特刊

Balancing Youth Autonomy and the Unique Nature of Buddhist Organisations Opinion Articles

YBAM asserts that youth organisations should retain a degree of autonomy in determining their
operational models, especially when fulfilling religious and cultural missions. Excessive regulation for
administrative convenience may suppress organisational diversity and the vitality of civil society.
Therefore, YBAM advocates for the amendment to preserve space for ‘self-defined organisations’ and
encourages coexistence of diverse organisational models — such as the creation of a ‘religious-cultural
youth organisation’ category with more flexible operating rules.

Conclusion:

YBAM’s Adjustment Strategies and Future Outlook

Although the amendment to Act 668 has brought structural challenges, it
has also encouraged YBAM to reassess its positioning and reinforce youth-led
mechanisms. Through constitutional revisions, structural reforms, and policy
advocacy, YBAM is gradually establishing a new model of ‘grassroots + elite
synergy’ and ‘youth + senior co-governance.’
Looking ahead, YBAM will continue to:
•Develop a platform for transferring existing structures and assets;
•Encourage youth under 30 to actively participate in decision-making and
youth-focused platforms within the organisation;
•Retain the advisory, mentorship, and educational roles of senior
members;
•Advocate for the legal recognition of religious youth organisations within
national policies;
•Expand collaborations with the government, civil society, and international
youth organisations.
Through this strategic transformation, YBAM not only adapts to the
regulatory environment but also positions itself as a key bridge and guiding
force in youth civic engagement — promoting deep connections among faith,
culture, and society.

131