Page 368 - Deep Learning
P. 368

Belief Revision: The Resubsumption Theory      351

            their actions, initiatives and votes are consistent with those values and prin-
            ciples. Like any adult, our hypothetical everyman-turned-politico also has an
            intuitive theory about trade, about buying and selling, about one person offer-
            ing something that has a certain worth or value to somebody else, who might
            therefore be ready to offer something of equal value in return. This theory is
            normally evoked in the context of deciding on a purchase or a sale, not politics.
            But even modest experience with politics as actually practiced might cause a
            person to re-conceptualize the work of politicians in terms of trades. Nothing
            can be accomplished unless a politician is ready to trade favors, and the effec-
            tive politician knows the political worth of every favor traded and never trades
            away more than he gains. The veridicality of this view of politics is not the issue
            here, only the fact that a change from the Civics Theory to the Trade Theory
            illustrates how a theory formed in the course of everyday activities like buying
            groceries and shopping for a new car can turn out to provide a better structure
            for understanding a superficially very dissimilar domain of experience than a
            theory that was originally formed with reference to that domain.
               As an example with scientific subject matter, consider biological evolu-
            tion via genetic variation and natural selection. Darwin invented this theory
            to explain the pattern of similarities and differences among living species, their
            geographical distributions, the fossil record and other features of the living
            world. As originally stated, his theory was embedded in the biological domain;
            it was about organisms, species and, after the modern synthesis, genes and
            mutations. However, the schema of variation and selection, once invented, can
            subsume other domains as well. At one point, the theory that the immune sys-
            tem develops antibodies that are targeted for a particular virus – which raises
            the question of how the immune system derives information from the virus in
            order to concoct the right antibody – gave ground to the idea that antibodies
            evolve through variation and selection. The immune system issues antibod-
            ies of great variety, and it makes more of those antibodies that match foreign
            particles in the body. In this way, the functioning of the immune system can
                                                         26
            be resubsumed under the variation-selection principle.  The first person who
            thought of the immune system in this way underwent conceptual change, and
            given the likelihood that he or she already knew the theory of evolution, this
            was an instance of resubsuming the facts of immunology under the theory
            originally developed to explain the history of life.
               To  verify  that  this  was  not  an  isolated  instance,  consider  two  other
              resubsumptions  involving  variation  and  selection.  First,  Walter  G.  Vincent
            has proposed that the variation-selection theory can be applied to the his-
            tory of aviation: Aeronautical engineers developed a variety of wing shapes,
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373