Page 467 - Deep Learning
P. 467

450                    Notes to Pages 341–359

                an expanse between the waters to separate water from water.’ So God made the
                expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And
                it was so. … And God said, ‘Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place,
                and let dry ground appear.’ And it was so. … Then God said, ‘Let the land produce
                vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it,
                according to their various kinds.’ And it was so” (Genesis 1–11, New International
                Version). This description lacks any causal mechanism. Creation in this sense
                differs from production through a material process like natural selection. Those
                who say that natural selection is God’s way of creating new species resolve their
                cognitive dissonance by abandoning the distinction between these two meanings
                of “create.”
              20.  Ranney and Schank (1998), Ranney, Schank, Mosmann and Montoya (1993) and
                Thagard (1992).
              21.  Rokeach (1970, p. 167).
              22.  Koestler (1964).
              23.  The repeated application of cognitive schemas to anything in the environment
                to which they might apply is a theme that runs across Piaget’s writings; see, e.g.,
                Piaget (1963).
              24.  See Gentner (1983) and Markman and Gentner (2000). Key works on analogy
                include Carbonell (1983, 1986), Falkenheimer, Forbus and Gentner (1989), Forbus,
                Gentner and Law (1994), Holyoak and Thagard (1989ab), Keane, Ledgeway and
                Duff (1994) and Veloso and Carbonell (1993). For the idea that structural similar-
                ity also provides a mechanism for schema application, see, e.g., Gick and Holyoak
                (1980,  1983),  Holland,  Holyoak,  Nisbett  and  Thagard  (1986),  Ohlsson  (1993b),
                Ohlsson and Hemmerich (1999) and Ohlsson and Lehtinen (1997).
              25.  Quine (1951, p. 39).
              26.  Gazzinaga (1992), French, Laskov and Scharff (1989) and Jerne (1967).
              27.  Vincent (1993).
              28.  See Aunger (2002), Blackmore (1999), Brodie (1996) and Lynch, (1996).
              29.  The papers collected by Polk and Seifert (2002) and by Sun (2008) provide exam-
                ples of a wide range of computer models of cognitive processes.
              30.  The ontological shift idea was first stated in Chi (1992) and has since undergone
                considerable  evolution  (Chi,  1997,  2005;  Chi  &  Brem,  2009;  Chi,  Slotta  &  de
                Leeuw, 1994). It is supported by a literature review (Reiner, Slotta, Chi & Resnick,
                2000), laboratory studies (Chi, 2005; Slotta, Chi & Joram, 1995), instructional
                interventions (Chi & Rosco, 2002; Slotta & Chi, 2006) and by comparisons to
                historical cases of conceptual change in science (Chi & Hausmann, 2003). For an
                experimental approach to the study of category shifts, see also Cosejo, Oesterreich
                and Ohlsson (2009).
              31.  The difficulty of conceptual change is attributed to a lack of awareness of the
                need for such a shift (Chi & Rosco, 2002, p. 18), a lack of the correct target cat-
                egory (Chi & Rosco, 2002, p. 19) and “the cognitive demand of re-inheriting all
                the attributes of a concept based on its new categorical membership” (Chi, 2005,
                p. 188).
              32.  D. Kuhn (1989) articulates this argument.
   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472