Page 64 - MARKETING & PUBLIC RELATIONS EBOOK IC88
P. 64

want  to  do  so  (values)  and  not  because of  any  penalties  prescribed  by law. People  stand  in
                      queues or do not pick other's pockets, because they think it is wrong to do otherwise. Those
                      who do not think so, will do so, despite the existence of laws and penalties. It is not as if they
                      have no values, what they do are not wrong

                   2.  Every member of an organisation must understand its values. Otherwise, will act in a manner
                      contrary to what the company thinks is right. Conformity in behaviour is achieved easier through
                      shared values through shared values than through rules and regulations. Value dissemination is
                      also necessary for empowerment.

                   3.  In the case of insurance companies, the values will relate to the
                     extent to which the laws and regulations will be observed or avoided (letter versus spirit).
                     the attitude towards settlement of claims (try to pay or try to avoid).
                     biases (unequal treatment) in dealing with employees or clients.

               (c) Ethical Dilemma

                   1.  When  a  choice  has  to  be  made  between  alternatives,  a  decision  has  to  be  made.  If  the
                      alternatives  can  be  evaluated  on  economic  or  such  other  measurable  considerations,  which
                      throw up clearly some data helping to decide which alternative to prefer, there is no difficulty in
                      making the decision. If the alternatives have equal weight on the relevant criteria, there could
                      be  difficulty  in  making  the  choice.  That  situation  is  called  a  dilemma.  Sometimes,  all  the
                      available choices may have ethical implications. That is to say, any choice wilt be right as well as
                      wrong at the same time. When this happens, there is an ethical dilemma.

                   2.  Individuals find different ways to resolve ethical dilemmas. No choice is fully justifiable. What is
                      done is to justify the choice to oneself with a statement of rationalisation. The statements used
                      to rationalise are of the following nature.

                     It is not really wrong (it is within reasonable limits).
                     It is in the interest of the organisation.
                     It is expected.
                     It will not be found out.
                     The company will protect me.
                     It won't hurt anybody.
                     Others are doing so.
                     It would save money or make money.
                     There is no other way.
                     Others will understand.
                     It is not that important.
                     I am only following instructions.
                     I am only doing a job.
                     I am not responsible for the decisions.
                     I will be excused.

               (d) Managing Ethics













                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69