Page 37 - Insurance Times September 2020
P. 37

or deficiency in the present practices, felt by an average
         person in understanding the sector.


         Over the years, societies have developed two primary
         indicators to facilitate understanding and judgment on the
         role of insurance in the economy and the stage of its
         development. First, indicator is called “insurance
         penetration” and the second one is known as “insurance
         density”. While insurance as a percentage of country's GDP
         is an indicator of penetration, the insurance premium per
         citizen represents insurance density.

         In India penetration is little less than 1.0 % for general
         insurance and is about 3.7% for insurance (Life and Nonlife
         together) and Indian Insurance (nonlife) density works out
         approximately to Rs 1241/- (2019-20). These two indicators
                                                              This measure may be good and meaningful for an intra-
         on their own, I do not think, make any sense to an average
                                                              sector comparison. But when it comes to intersector
         person. However, if these indicators are presented along
                                                              comparison, it has no value. Correct revenue on which
         with, say the corresponding penetration indicator of South
                                                              expense ratio is to be calculated for inter-sector sector
         Africa (or any other country/ies), which is 13.77%(2017), or
         insurance density in South Africa to be approximately 15  comparison has to be an addition of both inward and
                                                              outward interests and not the net of them. Because banks
         times that of India, or along with the corresponding figures
                                                              render service to both segments of customers (Borrowers
         of the previous year (or any other earlier point of time/s or
         periods), it starts making some sense to the reader. Similarly  as well as depositors). Net interest income as a revenue is
                                                              unique to banking. Similarly there is no corresponding item
         if the insurance penetration of non life insurance of 0.99%
                                                              in banking comparable to claims cost in insurance.
         is presented along with corresponding indicator 7.7% of
         banking industry it will make some sense.
                                                              Thus making inter-sector comparison a nonsense. May be,
         Yet, in both cases it is not an adequate and complete  the outward interest can represent the same. Similarly there
         understanding. It does not convey the clear picture even to  are no readily available items in manufacturing industry
         the well read ones. Will such information enable the reader  comparable to the claims cost of insurers. In two leading
         to decisively conclude that the high South African indicators  manufacturing organisations the cost of material with
         stand for better insurance awareness and capacity of  related expenses of power, freight, wages and
         Africans and they do not stand for the poor and riskier  manufacturing over heads amounted to 65-70 percentage
         environment prevailing in that country ?             of the total cost. This may well correspond to the claims cost
                                                              of insurers. Re-organising such factors would definitely
         Similarly can it be rightly concluded that role of insurance is  facilitate some meaningful inter-sector comparison. At times
         secondary to that of banking because of the low figure of  even intra-sector comparison will be confusing.
         insurance penetration compared to that of banking ? This
         dilemma is true of / for many insurance parameters. Let us  Take an example relating to insurance commission as a
         examine another parameter. Expense ratio. If an average  percentage of premium. This ratio of a leading insurer used
         reader is presented with the expense ratios of organisations  to be unreliably very low compared to other comparable
         in different sectors (Insurer, Banker, Mutual fund,  insurers, thereby confusing the reader in their judgment.
         Manufacturer.......) will he be able to make any sense of true  Take another instance where a trainee participant from a
         efficiency from such figures ? Definitely not. In an annual  neighbouring country, when asked about the Motor TP
         report of a leading banker, the operating expenses were  claims ratio of his country, replied, that the ratio is around
         expressed as a percentage of net interest income (Interest  30 to 35%. Being used to ratios ranging from 150% to 250%
         earned on loans and advances less interest paid on deposits).  observed in my country, I was confused and left struggling


                                                                     The Insurance Times, September 2020 33
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42