Page 33 - PR Communication Age - JUNE 2016

missioner of Anantnag, Kashmir every minded or reasonable person would President's car description
six months. The court also directed do, no interference by the court is will not be open to public
Central government "to use its good called for. for safety
offices to ensure compliance of the
aforesaid directions by the Govern- The view that the increase in rates of The home ministry has refused to dis-
ment of State of Jammu & Kashmir". service tax in respect of bank guaran- close the make, model numbers and
tee and insurance premium is directly registration numbers of cars used by
NHAI's appeal against relatable to terms of the contract is the President. The ministry said it is a
award rejected certainly a possible view." matter of national security and reveal-
ing such details might pose a threat to
The Supreme Court has dismissed the SC asks cause for not mak- the President.
appeal of the National Highways Au- ing FIR public from Centre,
thority of India against the order of the States Redressal commission di-
Delhi high court, which had approved rects doctors to pay com-
the award of the arbitration tribunal The Supreme Court sought response pensation for death
in the dispute of the public sector un- from the Centre and state govern-
dertaking with JSC Centrodorstroy. The ments on why FIRs should not be made The National Consumer Disputes
latter firm was given a project to build public by uploading on police websites Redressal Commission has directed two
a four-lane national highway in Uttar within 24 hours after being lodged. Himachal Pradesh based doctors to pay
Pradesh. Rs. 10 lakh to the family of a woman,
A bench of justices Dipak Misra and who died after they performed an "un-
Two disputes arose between the par- Shiva Kirti Singh issued notice to the wanted" uterus removal operation in
ties, namely, compensation for addi- Union government and all states seek- "haste" 13 years ago. The doctors had
tional costs on account of increase in ing their response on uploading of FIRs denied any negligence.
service tax on the insurance premium on websites on a PIL filed by an
and bank guarantee charges. The Uttarakhand based organisation. 5 years imprisonment for
award went in favour of the builder. chain-snatchers
The appeal against it was dismissed by "FIR is a public document; however, to
the high court. obtain a copy of FIR from police is not The Maharashtra government has de-
an easy task for the general public. cided to increase the punishment for
The Supreme Court examined the Therefore, if the FIR is put on websites chain-snatching up to five years of rig-
terms of the contract and observed it would be in the larger public inter- orous imprisonment along with a fine
that "construction of the terms of a est and the same will also avoid many of Rs 25,000 if the victim is injured. In
contract is primarily for an arbitral tri- difficulties being faced by the general cases where there is no injury the pun-
bunal to decide and unless it construes public," the petitioner, Youth Bar As- ishment ranges between two and five
the contract in such a way that no fair- sociation of India, said in its plea. years.

Attention Subscribers

Please renew your subscription timely in order to receive regular supply of the journal. While
renewing please mention your subscriber number for fast processing of the renewal.

Please also mention your update address, email and mobile number. For any queries you may call
at 9883398055/9883380339 or send email at info@sashipublications.com

Make the customer the hero of your story."

PR COMMUNICATION AGE June 2016 33