Page 14 - DTPA Journal Aug 18
P. 14

DTPA - J | 2017-18 | Volume 3 | August 2018



           gave rise to any  capital gains.  However, the assessing   registered can be used as piece of evidence.  Subraya
           authority held that there was a transfer, there was a    M.N.  V/s.  Vitalla M.N. & Others  -  AIR 2016 S.C. 3236.
           capital gain and, therefore, the assessee was liable to   An  oral  partition  of  joint  family  property  amongst
           pay the tax.   The Commissioner(Appeals) confirmed   members of a HUF is permissible  :  AIR 1958 S.C. 706;
           the order.  The Tribunal held that there was no transfer   AIR 1988 S.C. 881;   259-ITR-265 (S.C.)
           and it was only a family arrangement.   Therefore, the   15. Conclusion  :
           assessee was not liable to pay tax on capital gains.  On
           appeal to the High Court    It was held  :  “A partition is   Always a sincere attempt should be to resort to tax
           not a transfer.  What is recorded in a family settlement is   management, so as to have large cash flow and expand
           nothing but a partition.  Every member has an enterior    the trade and promote new industries.  Each one of the
           title  to  the  property  which  is  the  subject-matter  of  a   functionary should resolve to  act for common good and
           transaction, that is partition or a family   arrangement.     for the welfare of the citizens.  It is high time that ways
           So there is adjustment of shares, crystallization of the   and  means  are  evolved  whereby  honest  and  law
           respective rights in family properties and, therefore, it   abiding  taxpayers  are  not  put  to  inconvenience,
                                                              harassment  and  witch-hunting.  The  tax
           cannot be construed as a transfer in the eye of law.
           When there is no transfer there is no capital gains and   administration need to be geared up to come up to
           consequently no tax on capital gains is liable to be paid”.    the expectations of the honest tax-payers.  It is high
                                                                                 st
           C.I.T.  v.  R.  Nagaraja  Rao  (2013)  352-ITR-565   time  that  during  71     year  of  Independence,  all
           (Karnataka) at 566.                                citizens resolve to eliminate tax evasion and bring
                                                              glory to Bharat.  Let each tax payer to pledge to pay
           14. Family  arrangement  /  settlement  though  not
                                                              the due taxes forthwith after due planning.



















































           11 | Direct Taxes Professionals' Association - Journal                                  www.dtpa.org
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19