Page 16 - DTPA Journal Aug 18
P. 16

DTPA - J | 2017-18 | Volume 3 | August 2018


               Supreme  Court in  CIT  vs.  Green  World  Meaning of directions and reopening on basis
               Corp. [314 ITR 81 (SC)]                    of dictates not allowed
               Supreme  Court in  Trustees  of  The  HEZ  Multiplicity  of  proceedings  not  allowed  on
               Nizam vs. CIT [242 ITR 381 (SC)]           same cause of action
               Delhi  High  Court  in  J.  Sekar  vs.  UOI  Reasons  to  believe  recording  explained  at
               [W.P.(C) 8100/2017] (12/01/2018)           length  with  reference  to  application  of  mind
                                                          angle  (held  rubber  stamp  reasons  no
                                                          reasons)
               Delhi High Court in Sabh Infrastructure vs.  Standard procedure in reopening stipulated
               ACIT [398 ITR 198 (Delhi)]
               Supreme  Court  in  ITO  vs.  Techspan  India  Merely a change of opinion on facts already
               Pvt Ltd. & Another [404 ITR 10 (SC)]       available in original assessment proceedings
                                                          — reassessment not permissible
               Supreme Court in P G & W Sawoo Pvt Ltd  Increase  of  rent  with  retrospective  effect  —
               and  Another  vs.  ACIT  [2016]  385  ITR  no right to receive income arose in previous
               60(SC)                                     year — notice for reassessment not valid


           3.  Notice issuance & service : refer following legal   Income-tax (Intelligence and Criminal Investigation) or
           provisions & case laws                             to  the  Joint  Director  of  Income-tax  (Intelligence  and
                                                              Criminal Investigation); or
            a. Section 282 & Section 282A;
                                                               (vi) the address of the assessee as available in the
            b. Rule 127 & Rule 127A;
                                                              records of the Government; or
            c. Notification  of  20/12/2017-  In  the  Income-tax
              Rules, 1962, in rule 127, in sub-rule (2), after the   (vii) the address of the assessee as available in the
              proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted:-   records  of  a  local  authority  as  referred  to  in  the
                                                              Explanation below clause (20) of section 10 of the Act.”
           “Provided further that where the communication cannot
           be delivered or transmitted to the address mentioned in   d. Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Pr. CIT-1
           item (i) to (iv) or any other address furnished by the   vs. Atlanta Capital Pvt. Ltd. in ITA Nos. 6650 &
           addressee  as  referred  to  in  first  proviso,  the   6651/2015,  order  dated  21.09.2015  and  CIT  vs.
           communication shall be delivered or transmitted to the   Chetan Gupta [(2016) 382 ITR 613 (Del.)];
           following address:—                                  e.  Whether AO is duty bound to refer latest available
                                                                  address, Yes (CIT vs. Eshaan Holding (P.) Ltd.
           (i)  the  address  of  the  assessee  as  available  with  a
           banking company or a co-operative bank to which the    [(2012) 344 ITR 0541(Del)]; Service by mode given
           Banking  Regulation  Act,  1949  (10  of  1949)  applies   in  notification  of  20/12/2017  to  be  chosen  when
           (including any bank or banking institution referred to in   notice could not be served normally; on non issue of
           section 51 of the said Act); or                        notice objection can be raised at any stage as issue
                                                                  is not covered u/s 292BB (refer PCIT vs. Silver line
            (ii) the address of the assessee as available with the   [(2016) 383 ITR 455 (Del.)] etc);
           Post  Master  General  as  referred  to  in  clause  (j)  of
           section 2 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898);   f. Notice issued to wrong address — objection raised
           or                                                     by  assessee  before  completion  of  reassessment
                                                                  proceedings  —  reassessment  not  valid  [Ardent
            (iii) the address of the assessee as available with the   Steel  Ltd.  vs.  ACIT  [(2018)  405  ITR  422
           insurer  as  defined  in  clause  (9)  of  section  2  of  the   (Chhattisgarh)].
           Insurance Act, 1938 (4 of 1938); or
                                                              4.  Nature of return filed in pursuance to notice u/s
           (iv) the address of the assessee as furnished in Form   148 Important aspects
           No.61 to the Director of Income-tax (Intelligence and
           Criminal  Investigation)  or  to  the  Joint  Director  of   a. The Return is akin to return u/s 139 and section
           Income-tax  (Intelligence  and  Criminal  Investigation)   148(1),  filing  of  return  u/s  148  cannot  confer
           under sub-rule (1) of rule 114D; or                    jurisdiction on AO;
                                                                b. Income declared in said return ordinarily cannot
           (v) the address of the assessee as furnished in Form
           No.61A under sub-rule (1) of rule 114E to the Director of   invite concealment penalty as it is prior to detection
                                                                  (Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case




           13 | Direct Taxes Professionals' Association - Journal                                  www.dtpa.org
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21