Page 22 - Banking Finance September 2022
P. 22

LEGAL UPDATE


          jewellery belonged to the family mem-  ceeded the  deductibles for  various  creditor. "From a reading of Sections
          bers of the assessee of the assessment  lapses in work, as per the contract -  8 and 9 of the IBC, it is patently clear
          order. Therefore, the AO has erred in  such as liquidated damages.   that an operational creditor can only
          giving effect to the CBDT instruction on                             trigger the CIRP process when there is
                                            HBL took the matter to the appellate
          the gold jewellery belonging to the
                                            tribunal, NCLAT, which reversed NCLT's  an undisputed debt and a  default in
          mother of the assessee while allowing
                                            verdict,  saying  it should have  disal-  payment thereof. If the  claim of  an
          the gold jewellery belonging to the
                                            lowed the Corporate Insolvency Reso-  operational creditor is undisputed and
          mother-in-law of the assessee. The
                                            lution Process (CIRP).             the operational debt remains unpaid,
          mother of the assessee was staying
                                                                               CIRP must commence, for IBC does not
          with  her  daughter,  who  is the  only  SS Engineers then approached the Su-
                                                                               countenance dishonesty or deliberate
          daughter, and hence the  benefit  of  preme Court against the NCLAT order.
                                                                               failure to repay the dues of an opera-
          CBDT Instruction No. 1916 should also  The apex court agreed with the appel-
                                                                               tional creditor. However, if the debt is
          be extended to the mother of the as-  late tribunal, saying NCLT had "commit-
                                                                               disputed, the application of the opera-
          sessee.                           ted a grave error of law by admitting
                                                                               tional  creditor  for initiation  of CIRP
          The department supported the order  the  application  of  the  operational
                                                                               must be dismissed."
          of the AO but could not controvert the  creditor, even though there was a pre-
          taxing of excess jewellery belonging to  existing dispute".
                                                                               Post office staff swindled
          the mother of the assessee.
                                            It said that under Section 9 of the IBC,
                                            the adjudicating authority would have Rs.  96  crore  of  public
          NCLT not a debt collection        to examine (i) whether there was an
                                                                               money
                                            operational debt exceeding Rs. 1 lakh;
          forum, says SC                                                       The staff at post offices misappropri-
                                            (ii) whether the  evidence furnished
          The Supreme Court has categorically                                  ated Rs 95.62 crore of public money
                                            with the application showed that debt
          said that in a dispute between an op-                                between November 2002 and Septem-
                                            exceeding Rs. 1  lakh  had  not  been
          erational creditor and a company, the                                ber 2021, the Comptroller and Auditor
                                            paid; and (iii) whether there was any
          operational creditor cannot sue the                                  General has said.
                                            dispute  between  the  parties  or  a
          company  for insolvency. It does not
                                            record of pendency of a suit or arbitra-  The money may seem small but it is
          matter whether there is merit in the
                                            tion proceedings filed before the re-  what common citizen invested in post
          stand of the operational creditor - af-
                                            ceipt of a demand notice in relation to  office savings, the oldest and the larg-
          ter all, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
          Code's (IBC) purpose is not to sit in judg-  the dispute. If any of the conditions  est banking system in the country. The
          ment of commercial disputes.      was not fulfilled, the application of the  system serves the investment needs of
                                            operational creditor would have to be  urban  and  rural  clients  through
          The apex court said this in its verdict
                                            rejected.                          schemes such as savings bank, recur-
          in the SS Engineers vs Hindustan Petro-
                                                                               ring deposits, time deposits, national
          leum Corporation case.            They further said that the NCLT, exer-
                                                                               savings certificates, kisan vikas patras,
                                            cising powers under Section 7 or Sec-
          SS Engineers believed it had provided
                                            tion 9 of IBC, "is not a debt collection  public provident fund, monthly income
          services worth Rs. 38 crore to HPCL
                                                                               account  scheme, sukanya  samriddhi
                                            forum". The IBC deals with insolvency
          Biofuels  Ltd  (HBL),  a  subsidiary  of
                                                                               accounts and senior citizens savings
                                            and bankruptcy. "It is not the object of
          HPCL. HBL was  not  happy with  the
                                            the IBC that CIRP should be initiated  scheme.
          services and refused to pay. A dispute
                                            to penalise solvent companies for non-  It also found instances of manipulation
          arose. SS Engineers sued HBL for insol-
          vency at the National Company Law  payment of disputed dues claimed by  in the database by opening fake ac-
          Tribunal (NCLT), Kolkata.         an operational creditor."          counts and making fake entries of de-
          The NCLT admitted the insolvency pro-  The verdict further stresses that there  posits into these accounts and subse-
          ceedings against HBL, thus favouring  are "noticeable differences" in the IBC  quent  withdrawal  of  money  of  Rs
          SS  Engineers,  and  held  that  the  between the initiation of CIRP by a fi-  15.98 crore  from these accounts in
          company's  dues  from  HBL  far  ex-  nancial creditor and by an operational  four circles.
            22 | 2022 | SEPTEMBER                                                          | BANKING FINANCE
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27