Page 39 - Banking Finance March 2019
P. 39

ARTICLE

         of India Act, 1934 was established which says that that the  The government's willingness to exercise its authority to
         Union Government  can  "from  time  to  time  give  such  instruct the central bank on policy measures indicates its
         directions to the (Central) Bank as it may, after consultation  determination  to  quickly  ease  the  fund  crunch  that
         with the Governor of the Bank, considered necessary in the  businesses, especially smaller ones, are facing. Measures to
         public interest".                                    revive ailing segments of economy have to be taken by
                                                              sensing their pulse, rather than entirely going by macro
         It deals with the powers that the Government has to direct  numbers that sometimes do not reveal the real picture.
         the Reserve Bank of India on policy issues. It works on the
         principal that the government initiates a dialogue with the  The common thinking in the government is that while it is
         Central Bank with a specific mention of the Act and lists the  at ease, despite not being politically expedient, with RBI
         issues that it would like to discuss and this law empowers  sticking to its stance on interest rates as part of its policy in
         the Government to give instructions to the Central Bank. It  inflation targeting, it has reservations about its going far on
         is interesting to note that the RBI board at that time is said  matters pertaining to the economy.
         to have wanted a provision in the law that the government
         has to take responsibility for the consequences of any policy  The government is not expected to align its policies to suit
         that was forced on the RBI through Section 7, however it  the direction of the central bank. The centre does not mind
         was not accepted.                                    nudging RBI for course correction, given that unlike other
                                                              regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India
         Section 7 (2) further reads, "Subject to any such directions,  or the Competition Commission of India, the central bank
         the general superintendence and direction of the affairs and  does not have an appellate authority.
         business of the Bank shall be entrusted to a Central Board
         of Directors which may exercise all powers and do all acts  Reportedly, the government has delegated certain functions
         and things which may be exercised or done by the Bank."  to  the  RBI  and  the  latter  cannot  claim  absolute
                                                              independence. In short, RBI for its part is right in insisting
         Section  7(3)  reads,  "Save  as  otherwise  provided  in  that  the  rule  book  needs  to  be  adhered  to.  But  the
         regulations made by the Central Board, the Governor and  government, on the other hand, is equally right in arguing
         in his absence the Deputy Governor nominated by him in  that institutional freedom of RBI is not absolute-especially
         this  behalf,  shall  also  have  powers  of  general  if it believes that the decision could hurt an economy which
         superintendence and direction of the affairs and the business  is at a point of inflexion.
         of the Bank, and may exercise all powers and do all acts
         and things which may be exercised or done by the Bank."  However, consequences of such intractable situation and
                                                              coming out in public is that Mr Urjit Patel, the then governor,
         Insight:                                             has to quit the position of high regard which does not spell
                                                              good about the situation and the world  as  a whole  is
         The trigger this time was seemingly due to the intransigent  watching the development skeptically.
         position adopted by the two institutions over three issues. The
         well known and widely discussed differences apparently are:  Way-out:
         i.  the disinclination of RBI to dilute the prompt corrective
             action(PCA) directive imposed upon the 11 public sector  In respect of the point i. regarding PCA on PSU banks, it may
             banks . Two of them, Dena Bank and Allahabad Bank,  be recalled that as per the statistics, the PSU banks had
             are also facing restrictions on expansion.       aggregate NPAs of Rs 2.5 lakh cores in 2015 which has
                                                              grown to nearly Rs10.00 lakh corers in Mar'2018, a fourfold
          ii. the refusal of RBI to relax actions on some major power  increase  which  is  alarming  to  say  the  least. The  then
             sector companies i.e. exempting severely indebted  Governor  RBI  is  said  to  have  submitted  a  list  of  top
             power companies from the 12 February 2018 circular  defaulting firms to be given to Estimates Committee of
             which identified them as bankrupt.               Parliament and had also submitted a letter explaining the
         iii. The difference in perceptions about the reserves with  position. The list contained names of those large corporate
             RBI and right of the government to demand transfer  who have contributed significantly i.e. more than 70% to
             them to the government as demanded to bridge its fiscal  the ballooning of NPAs, and have grown many fold in the
             deficit gap.                                     next three years.

            BANKING FINANCE |                                                               MARCH | 2019 | 39
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44