Page 265 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 265

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   unidentified high civilization which passed through the same epoch?
                     And could the myths be attempts to communicate?



                   A message in the bottle of time

                     ‘Of all the other stupendous inventions,’ Galileo once remarked,

                      what sublimity of mind must have been his who conceived how to communicate
                      his most secret thoughts to any other person, though very distant either in time or
                      place, speaking with those who are in the Indies, speaking to those who are not
                      yet born, nor shall be this thousand or ten thousand years? And with no greater
                      difficulty  than  the various arrangements  of  two dozen little signs on  paper? Let
                      this be the seal of all the admirable inventions of men.
                                                                           3
                   If the ‘precessional message’ identified by scholars like Santillana, von
                   Dechend and Jane Sellers is indeed a deliberate attempt at
                   communication by some lost civilization of antiquity, how come it wasn’t
                   just written down and left for us to find? Wouldn’t that have been easier
                   than encoding it in myths? Perhaps.
                     Nevertheless, suppose that whatever the message was written on got
                   destroyed or worn away after many thousands of years? Or suppose that
                   the language in which it was inscribed was later forgotten utterly (like the
                   enigmatic Indus Valley script, which  has been studied closely for more
                   than half a century but has so far resisted all attempts at decoding)? It
                   must be obvious that in such circumstances a written legacy to the future
                   would be of no value at all, because nobody would be able to make sense
                   of it.
                     What one would look for, therefore, would be a universal language, the
                   kind of language that would be comprehensible to any technologically
                   advanced society in any epoch, even a thousand or ten thousand years
                   into the future. Such languages are few and far between, but mathematics
                   is one of them—and the city of Teotihuacan may be the calling-card of a
                   lost civilization written in the eternal language of mathematics.
                     Geodetic data, related to the exact positioning of fixed geographical
                   points and to the shape and size of  the earth, would also remain valid
                   and recognizable for tens of thousands of years, and might be most
                   conveniently expressed by means of cartography (or in the construction
                   of giant geodetic monuments like the Great Pyramid of Egypt, as we shall
                   see).
                     Another ‘constant’ in our solar system is the language of time: the
                   great but regular intervals of time calibrated by the inch-worm creep of
                   precessional motion. Now, or ten thousand years in the future, a message
                   that prints out numbers like 72 or 2160 or 4320 or 25,920 should be
                   instantly intelligible to any civilization that has evolved a modest talent
                   for mathematics and the ability to detect and measure the almost


                   3  Galileo, cited in Hamlet’s Mill, p. 10.


                                                                                                     263
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270