Page 262 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 262

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   Finnish Hamlet, there is a poignant  scene in which the hero, returning
                   home after a long absence, meets a maiden in the woods, gathering
                   berries. They lie together. Only later do they discover that they are
                   brother and sister. The maiden drowns  herself at once. Later, with ‘the
                   black dog Musti’ padding along at his heels, Kullervo wanders into the
                   forest and throws himself upon his sword.
                                                                    40
                     There are no suicides in the Egyptian myth of Osiris, but there is the
                   incest of Osiris and his sister Isis. Out of their union is born Horus the
                   avenger.
                     So once again it seems reasonable to ask: what is going on? Why are
                   there all these apparent links and  connections? Why do we have these
                   ‘strings’ of myths, ostensibly about different subjects, all of which prove
                   capable in their own ways of shedding light on the phenomenon of
                   precession of the equinoxes? And why do all these myths have dogs
                   running through them, and characters who seem unusually inclined to
                   incest, fratricide and revenge? It surely drives scepticism beyond its limits
                   to suggest that so many identical literary devices could keep on turning
                   up purely by chance in so many different contexts.
                     If not by chance, however, then who exactly was responsible for
                   creating this  intricate and clever connecting pattern? Who were the
                   authors and designers of the puzzle and what motives might they have
                   had?



                   Scientists with something to say

                   Whoever it was, they must have  been smart—smart enough to have
                   observed the infinitesimal creep of precessional motion along the ecliptic
                   and to have calculated its rate at a value uncannily close to that obtained
                   by today’s advanced technology.
                     It therefore follows that we are talking about highly civilized people.
                   Indeed, we are talking about people who deserve to be called scientists.
                   They must, moreover, have lived in extremely remote antiquity because
                   we can be certain that the creation and dissemination of the common
                   heritage of precessional myths on both sides of the Atlantic did not take
                   place in historic times. On the contrary the evidence suggests that all
                   these myths were ‘tottering with age’ when what we call history began
                   about 5000 years ago.
                                             41
                     The great strength of the ancient stories was this: as well as being for
                   ever available for use and adaptation free of copyright, like intellectual
                   chameleons, subtle and ambiguous, they had the capacity to change their
                   colour according to their surroundings. At different times, in different
                   continents, the ancient tales could be retold in a variety of ways, but

                   40  Ibid., p. 33.
                   41  Ibid., p. 119.


                                                                                                     260
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267