Page 260 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 260

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   ordinary years,  again supplying the digits for basic precessional
                                      29
                   calculations. Separately there are Manvantaras (periods of Manu) of which
                   we are told in the scriptures that ‘about 71 systems of four Yugas elapse
                   during each Manvantara.’  The reader will recall that one degree of
                                                  30
                   precessional motion along the ecliptic requires 71.6 years to complete, a
                   number that can be rounded down to ‘about 71’ in India just as easily as
                   it was rounded up to 72 in Ancient Egypt.
                     The Kali Yuga, with a duration of 432,000 mortal years, is, by the way,
                   our own. ‘In the Kali Age,’ the scriptures say, ‘shall decay flourish, until
                   the human race approaches annihilation.’
                                                                   31


                   Dogs, uncles and revenge

                   It was a dog that brought us to these decaying times.
                     We came here by way of Sirius, the Dog Star, who stands at the heel of
                   the giant constellation of Orion where it towers in the sky above Egypt. In
                   that land, as we have seen, Orion is Osiris, the god of death and
                   resurrection, whose numbers—perhaps by chance—are 12, 30, 72, and
                   360. But can chance account for the  fact that these and other prime
                   integers of precession keep cropping up in supposedly unrelated
                   mythologies from all over the world, and in such stolid but enduring
                   vehicles as calendar systems and works of architecture?
                     Santillana and von Dechend, Jane Sellers and a growing body of other
                   scholars rule out chance, arguing that  the persistence of detail is
                   indicative of a guiding hand.
                     If they are wrong, we need to find some other explanation for how such
                   specific and inter-related numbers (the only obvious function of which is
                   to calculate precession) could by accident have got themselves so widely
                   imprinted on human culture.
                     But suppose they are  not  wrong? Suppose that a guiding hand really
                   was at work behind the scenes?
                     Sometimes, when you slip into Santillana’s and von Dechend’s world of
                   myth and mystery, you can almost feel the influence of that hand ... Take
                   the business of the dog ... or jackal, or wolf, or fox. The subtle way this
                   shadowy canine slinks from myth to myth is peculiar—stimulating, then
                   baffling you, always luring you onwards.
                     Indeed, it was this lure we followed from the Mill of Amlodhi to the
                   myth of Osiris in Egypt. Along the  way, according to the design of the
                   ancient sages (if Sellers, Santillana and von Dechend are right) we were
                   first encouraged to build a clear mental picture of the celestial sphere.
                   Second, we were provided with a mechanistic model so that we could


                     Ibid., pp. 353-4.
                   29
                   30  Ibid., p. 354.
                   31  Ibid., p. 247.


                                                                                                     258
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265