Page 293 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 293

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   historical record indicates little in its favour.
                     For example, the upper end of the well-shaft was entered off the Grand
                   Gallery by the Oxford astronomer John Greaves in 1638. He managed to
                   descend to a depth of about sixty feet. In 1765 another Briton, Nathaniel
                   Davison, penetrated to a depth of about 150 feet but found his way
                   blocked by an impenetrable mass of sand and stones. Later, in the 1830s,
                   Captain G.B. Caviglia, an Italian adventurer, reached the same depth and
                   encountered the same obstacle. More enterprising than his predecessors,
                   he hired Arab workers to start excavating the rubble in the hope that
                   there might be something of interest beneath it. Several days of digging
                   in claustrophobic conditions followed before the connection with the
                   descending corridor was discovered.
                                                              17
                     Is it likely that such a cramped, blocked-up shaft could have been a
                   viable conduit for the treasures of Khufu, supposedly the greatest
                   pharaoh of the magnificent Fourth Dynasty?
                     Even if it hadn’t been choked with debris and sealed at the lower end, it
                   could not have been used to bring out more than a tiny fraction of the
                   treasures of a typical royal tomb. This is because the well-shaft is only
                   three feet in diameter and incorporates several tricky vertical sections.
                     At the very least, therefore, when Ma’mun and his men battered their
                   way into the King’s Chamber around the year  AD 820, one would have
                   expected some of the bigger and heavier pieces from the original burial
                   to be still in place—like the statues and shrines that bulked so large in
                   Tutankhamen’s much later  and  presumably inferior tomb.  But  nothing
                                                                                         18
                   was found inside Khufu’s Pyramid, making this and the alleged looting of
                   Khafre’s monument the only tomb robberies in the history of Egypt which
                   achieved a clean sweep, leaving not  a single trace behind—not a torn
                   cloth, not a shard of broken pottery, not an unwanted figurine, not an
                   overlooked piece of jewellery—just the bare floors and walls and the
                   gaping mouths of empty sarcophagi.



                   Not like other tombs


                   It was now after six in the morning and the rising sun had bathed the
                   summits of Khufu’s and Khafre’s Pyramids with a fleeting blush of pastel-
                   pink light. Menkaure’s Pyramid, being some 200 feet lower than the other
                   two, was still in shadow as Santha and I skirted its north-western corner
                   and continued our walk into the rolling sand dunes of the surrounding
                   desert.
                     I still had the tomb robbery theory on my mind. As far as I could see the
                   only real ‘evidence’ in favour of it was the absence of grave goods and
                   mummies that it had been invented to explain in the first place. All the

                   17  Secrets of the Great Pyramid, pp. 56-8.
                   18  See Nicholas Reeves, The Complete Tutankhamun, Thames & Hudson, London, 1990.


                                                                                                     291
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298