Page 294 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 294

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   other facts, particularly where the Great Pyramid was concerned, seemed
                   to speak persuasively against any robbery having occurred. It was not just
                   a matter of the narrowness and unsuitability of the well-shaft as an
                   escape route for bulky treasures. The other remarkable feature of Khufu’s
                   Pyramid was the absence of inscriptions or decorations anywhere within
                   its immense network of galleries, corridors, passageways and chambers,
                   and the same was true of Khafre’s and Menkaure’s Pyramids. In none of
                   these amazing monuments  had a single  word been written in praise of
                   the pharaohs whose bodies they were supposed to house.
                     This was exceptional. No other proven burial place of any Egyptian
                   monarch had ever been found undecorated. The fashion throughout
                   Egyptian history had been for the tombs of the pharaohs to be extensively
                   decorated, beautifully painted from top to bottom (as in the Valley of the
                   Kings at Luxor, for example) and densely inscribed with the ritual spells
                   and invocations required to assist  the deceased on his journey towards
                   eternal life (as in the Fifth Dynasty pyramids at Saqqara, just twenty miles
                   to the south of Giza.)
                                            19
                     Why had Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure done things so differently? Had
                   they not built their monuments to serve as tombs at all, but for another
                   and more subtle purpose? Or was it possible, as certain Arab and esoteric
                   traditions maintained, that the Giza pyramids  had been erected long
                   before the Fourth Dynasty by the architects of some earlier and more
                   advanced civilization?
                     Neither hypothesis was popular with Egyptologists for reasons that
                   were easy to understand. Moreover, while conceding that the Second and
                   Third Pyramids were completely devoid of internal inscriptions, lacking
                   even the names of Khafre and Menkaure, the scholars were able to cite
                   certain hieroglyphic ‘quarry marks’  (graffiti daubed on stone blocks
                   before they left the quarry) found inside the Great Pyramid, which did
                   seem to bear the name of Khufu.



                   A certain smell ...


                   The discoverer of the quarry marks was Colonel Howard Vyse, during the
                   destructive excavations he undertook at Giza in 1837. Extending an
                   existing crawlway, he cut a tunnel into the series of narrow cavities,
                   called ‘relieving chambers’, which lay directly above the King’s Chamber.
                   The quarry marks were found on the walls and ceilings of the top four of
                   these cavities and said things like this:

                                                   THE CRAFTSMEN-GANG,
                                     HOW POWERFUL IS THE WHITE CROWN OF KHNUM—


                   19  See Valley of the Kings; for Saqqara (Fifth and Sixth Dynasties) see Traveller’s Key to
                   Ancient Egypt, pp. 163-7.



                                                                                                     292
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299