Page 266 - Area 9 - Relevant Document

13

Resourcefulness. Inadequacies and other forms of problems often arise
as one pursues his research activities. A good researcher must be able to cope
and meet these problems with speedy and appropriate solutions. A
resourceful researcher must be able to render quick action to problems and
not be handicapped or shortsighted in meeting exigencies.

Conciseness. This trait refers to one's ability to write or express ideas
in the least number of words possible. Technical writing where research falls
requires brevity or conciseness - a skill in writing which is very important to
researchers. Writing direct to the point is the rule of thumb in this case.

Honesty. Research work needs a person who possesses a high moral
standard and wholesome attitude towards this kind of work. Above all things,
a good researcher must be intellectually honest. Truth and facts can only be
uncovered through honest, objective, and impartial inquiry. Indeed, there is
no substitute for the virtue of honesty in scientific undertakings. Researchers
who claim findings, which are not substantiated with scientific evidences but
are products of dishonesty and deceit, do not belong to the world of
researchers.

Interest. Research work is itself a big challenge to one's capability. It
demands industry, devotion, commitment, and above all, interest. A
researcher must therefore be zealous and must have ardent and self-
motivating interest to keep him active as a researcher.

Diligence. This refers to one's true dedication to his work. A good
researcher must possess sustained efforts and provide a steady attention to
his activities. Diligent workers are industrious, persevering, and determined
to accomplish goals.

Selflessness. This trait tells of one's concern for other's welfare
instead of oneself. A truly good researcher does not do research for material
reward and recognition; he does it not necessarily to bring him good things
in return but to others who need his findings to enhance their
understanding of aspects/issues around him, or to improve their live
selflessness among others.

Thesis
According to Coile and Bigelow (1935) defined as the report of a scholar
upon some piece of research, which he has completed. It is the combination
of a devious process extending from the initial insight into the opportunity for
investigation to the insertion of the final footnote. Many elements are involved,
and each offers the possibility of raising or lowering the quality of the product.
Most important of all in determining the character of the result, however, are
the fundamental aims of the writer, which should be an unveiling search for
truth, and original in substance.

To summarize the undergoing definition