Page 142 - PPP - Area 4
P. 142

to the VP-RDET for further study before endorsement by the University

                          President to the appropriate funding agencies.



                   2.  Research  Program/Project Proposal Screening/Evaluation and Approval


                       Research proposals shall be prepared in line with the flagship priorities of

                       the university, Local Government Units of the province, DOST, PCARRD,


                       HARRDEC  and  CHED,  relevant  to  the  enhancement  of  instruction,

                       technology generation, human and natural resources development.


                                     Evaluation and screening of research proposals shall conform

                          to the policies and guidelines set by the University in pursuance to the


                          priority goals of the Local Government Units, DOST, PCARRD, CHED

                          and  other  agencies  through  HARRDEC.  All  GAA  funded  research,


                          extension and training programs of the University shall fall within the

                          identified priorities of the University for the Improvement of instruction,


                          technology generation and human and natural resources development.


                                     Research  proposals  are  reviewed  and  evaluated  during  the


                          University Research Council Review (CRCR).  Relevant proposals shall

                          be recommended by the CRC for presentation during  the Agency In-


                          House Review (AIHR).


                                     During  the  AIHR,  proposals  are  reviewed,  evaluated,  and


                          recommended  for  approval.  The  rating  of  research  proposals  are  as

                          follows:



                                     a - Outstanding proposals. Good as approved with very

                                         minimal corrections.



                                     b - Very Satisfactory. For funding consideration subject to

                                         the incorporation of corrections



                                     c  - With major revision. Not to be implemented
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147