Page 201 - The Social Animal
P. 201

Self-Justification 183


               The concept of self-justification can be applied more broadly
           still. Suppose you are in the midst of a great natural disaster, such as
           an earthquake. All around you, buildings are toppling and people are
           getting killed and injured. Needless to say, you are frightened. Is
           there any need to seek justification for this fear? Certainly not. The
           evidence is all around you; the injured people and the devastated
           buildings are ample justification for your fear. But suppose, instead,
           the earthquake occurred in a neighboring town. You can feel the
           tremors, and you hear stories of the damage done to the other town.
           You are terribly frightened, but you are not in the midst of the dev-
           astated area; neither you nor the people around you have been hurt,
           and no buildings in your town have been damaged. Would you need
           to justify this fear? Yes. Much like the people in the Schachter-Singer
           experiment experiencing strong physical reactions to epinephrine but
           not knowing why, and much like our hypnotized friend in the rain-
           coat and galoshes, you would be inclined to justify your own actions
           or feelings. In this situation, you see nothing to be afraid of in the
           immediate vicinity, so you would be inclined to seek justification for
           the fact that you are scared out of your wits.
               These disaster situations are not hypothetical examples; they ac-
           tually occurred in India. In the aftermath of an earthquake, investi-
           gators collected and analyzed the rumors being spread. What they
                                                     1
           discovered was rather startling: Jamuna Prasad, an Indian psycholo-
           gist, found that when the disaster occurred in a neighboring village
           such that the residents in question could feel the tremors but were
           not in imminent danger, there was an abundance of rumors forecast-
           ing impending doom. Specifically, the residents of this village be-
           lieved, and helped spread rumors to the effect, that (1) a flood was
           rushing toward them; (2) February 26 would be a day of deluge and
           destruction; (3) there would be another severe earthquake on the day
           of the lunar eclipse; (4) there would be a cyclone within a few days;
           and (5) unforeseeable calamities were on the horizon.
               Why in the world would people invent, believe, and communi-
           cate such stories? Were these people masochists? Were they para-
           noid? Certainly these rumors would not encourage the people to
           feel calm and secure. One rather compelling explanation is that the
           people were terribly frightened, and because there was not ample
           justification for this fear, they invented their own justification.Thus,
           they were not compelled to feel foolish. After all, if a cyclone is on
           the way, isn’t it perfectly reasonable that I should be wild-eyed with
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206