Page 24 - All files for Planning Inspectorate update
P. 24

Analysis of documents released under the FOI
                                        Relating to MSDC Application DM/16/2845
                                                      Advice Given


        2.  EMAIL FROM STEVEN KING ON 13  OCTOBER 2016 AT 12.00
                                               TH
           As you know, planning law states that planning      AWNP takes precedence
           applications should be determined in accordance with
           the development plan unless material considerations
           indicate otherwise. In this case the development plan
           comprises the Mid Sussex local Plan (MSLP) and the
           more recently adopted Ashurst Wood Neighbourhood
           Plan. In the event of conflict between the two it is the
           more recent policy that takes precedence.

           Policy 9 allocates the site for housing development,
           stating the site has capacity for a minimum of 50
           dwellings. Therefore, the principle of a redevelopment
           of the site accords with the development plan and
           would be supported.

           In addition to the policy that allocates the site for
           redevelopment, there will be a number of other
           policies in the MSLP that would be relevant to a
           planning application on this site. I have set out what I
           consider to be the main policies below:
           G3, B1,B3,B4, H2, T4,T5,CS13, C5
          I have copied below the comments of the Councils
          Urban Designer on the plan that was discussed at our
          meeting.
          “This is an unsatisfactory layout (dwg L2359/sk5) for the
          following reasons:


           The car parking is inappropriately dominant, and made   −
           worse because the large car parks are located in the
           most visible part of the site, at the entrance and central
           area. The suggested tree planting will take time to
           establish and will have little screening benefit during
           the winter months when the extensive area of hard
           surfacing will dominate..

           The large gaps between the buildings and the weak    −
           building lines contribute to poor enclosure which as
           stated above is inadequately compensated for by the
           landscaping and made worse by the dominance of the
           parking.

           The inconsistency of the building types together with   −
           the above, results in an incohesive scheme. This is also
           not helped by a lack of central public open space that
           could act as a focus for the layout and future
           community.




        E:\Cobasco\Personal,  House and computer instructions\EDF and WH Development\MJC Plans theories and Objectives\Submission
        MJC to MSDC\FOI documents release.docx
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29