Page 139 - RATA: Manual Menilai Konflik Tenurial secara Cepat

128 Gamma Galudra, dkk.

mata pencaharian]. London: International Insti-
tute for Environment and Development.
Mehta L, Leach M, Nevell P, Scoones I, Sivaramakrishnan
K, Way SA. 1999. Exploring understandings of in-
stitutions and uncertainty: new directions in natu-
ral resource management [Mengeksplorasi pema-
haman lembaga dan ketidakpastian: tujuan baru
dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam]. Institute
of Development Studies, Discussion Paper 372.
Falmer, UK: University of Sussex.
Ostrom E. 2001. The puzzle of counterproductive prop-
erty rights reform: a conceptual analysis. In: De
Janvry A, Gordillo AG, Platteau JP, Sadoulet E,
eds. Access to land, rural poverty and public action
[Teka-teki reformasi hak properti yang kontra-
produktif: analisis konsep. Dalam: De Janvry A,
Gordillo AG, Platteau JP, Sadoulet E, eds. Akses
ke tanah, kemiskinan pedesaan, dan tindakan
publik]. p. 129–150. London: Oxford University
Press.
Ostrom E, Schlager E. 1996. The formation of property
rights. In: Hanna S, Folke C, Mäler KG, eds. Rights
to nature: ecological, economic, cultural, andpoliti-
cal principles of institutions for the environment [Hak
kea lam: prinsip ekologi, ekonomi, budaya, dan
politik lembaga untuk lingkungan]. p. 127–156.
Washington, DC: Island Press.
Otsuka K, Place F. 2001. Land tenure and natural resource
management: a comparative study of agrarian com-
munities in Asia and Africa [Pengelolaan pengu-