Page 115 - Transformasi Masyarakat Indonesia dan Historiografi Indonesia Modern
P. 115

Djoko Suryo

            both in the expansion of institutional arrangement and in
            changes in approach and in methods of study. In some cases
            these took the form of “area studies” in which the method of a
            variety of social science (sociology, anthropology, political sci-
            ence, economics) together with history, literature and philoso-
            phy were caried out together for the study of a certain area. In
            other cases, the disciplines were reserved as providing distinc-
            tive methods of understanding. With differing emphases and
            styles of organization, several programmes was developed in
            America, Canada, Britain, the Netherlands, the Soviet Union,
            Australia and New Zealand. At the same time Asian countries
            expanded the Southeast Asian emphases of existing universi-
            ties the Atanio de Manila), Chulalongkorn and Thammasat
            University in Bangkok, Gadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta,
            the University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur, and the University
            of Singapore).
                With regard to respond the challenge of globalization pro-
            cess in the 21   century, in this paper, 1 propose to expand the
                         st
            regional history of Southeast Asia from within by expanding
            the social history approach. As its name implies, social history
            deals with the history of society.  The chief problems of disci-
                                           17
            plinary delineation and explanation arise in establishing just
            what the Southeast Asian society is and how it could have a
            history. At one spectrum, it is primarily an interpretive recon-
            struction of the observable lives of ordinary people and as such
            being different from traditional history only by virtue of the
            sort of people it deals with. Another spectrum, places great
            emphasis upon the “scientific” counting of individual events.
            Both these approaches tend to see their object in atomistic terms,
            as consisting of the aggregation of host of discrete individual
            social or economic action or live. At the other end of the spec-
            trum is a view which sees social history as being concerned


                17  Christopher Lloyd, op.cit., pp.1

            94
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120