Page 397 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 397

Ranah Studi Agraria


            G.  Agricultural and Nonagricultural Bases of Inequality
               and Differentiation
                The preceding sections have documented some of the va-
            riations between villages in the precise form and pace of agra-
            rian changes occurring during a decade of successful agricul-
            tural intensification. Despite these variations some broad gene-
            ralizations are possible. We have seen that increasing land-

            lessness now leaves about half of all households without sawah
            ownership rights and about 40 without cultivation rights. The
            decline in share tenancies has contributed to the relative dec-
            line of smaller farm households (although their absolute num-
            bers may not have decreased), allowing average farm size to
            increase despite the pressure of population growth; agriculture
            remains dominated by small groups of households owning
            more than 1.0 ha of sawah who (although comprising less
            than 9 of all households in the nine sample neighborhoods)
            own more than half the available sawah.
                Some summary statistics on the levels and sources of in-
            come of the different landownership categories-departing from
            our usual practice and aggregating the nine sample neighbor-
            hoods are shown in Table 7.11. Space does not allow detailed
            discussion of the distribution of nonpaddy agricultural activi-
            ties and incomes (other seasonal crops, tree crops, livestock,
            poultry, and aquaculture) which together make up about one-
            third of the ‘own farm’ incomes shown in the table. (These are
            detailed for each sample neighborhood by landownership class
            in Abunawan Mintoro 1984: appendix 8.) Their overall distri-
            bution reflects that of paddy incomes, resulting in the highly
            unequal pattern of agricultural income distribution shown in

            328
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402