Page 351 - Publicationa15
P. 351

The Rule of Law for Democracy   343



                      The basic order of democracy means a political order trusting
                 autonomous reason and will of individuals, grounded upon
                 a pluralistic worldview, according to which, all political views have

                 relative truth and rationality, defying all sorts of violence and
                 arbitrary control, respecting the majority while still caring for the
                 minority, and composed of and operated by the democratic
                 decision-making process and freedom and equality.
                      However, the Court expressly suggested that, on account of
                 importance of a political party in a democratic system, a political
                 party should be permitted to freely pursue ideologies from diverse
                 spectrums as long as it does not deny the basic order of democracy,
                 and that the proportionality principle must be complied with in
                 evaluating the degree of violation of the basic order of democracy,
                 and that the existence of the concrete risk must be shown to
                 dissolve a political party.
                      Meanwhile, the Court also made efforts to make the Korean
                 society more egalitarian and respectful of human rights. For instance,

                 the Court democratically reformed the family system in Korea
                 and enhanced women’s rights through its decisions. In 2005,
                 we struck down the “Hoju” system which allowed only men to
                 head the family.
                      In the same year, a Civil Code provision which required persons
                 to follow the family name of the father was also struck down,
                 and in 2000, we held that the Nationality Act that adopted
                 paternal lineage system was unconstitutional.
                      Other significant decisions of the Court include the decision
                 in 2008 finding the unconstitutionality of age limitation for the civil
                 service examination, and the decisions in 1999 and 2006 finding
                 the unconstitutionality of extra points awarded to veterans and
                 family members of patriots in the civil service examination.







        _17-0315(337-352)16.indd   343                                     4/27/60 BE   11:58 AM
   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356