Page 712 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 712

c16GeneralEquilibriumTheory.qxd  8/16/10  9:14 PM  Page 686







                  686                   CHAPTER 16   GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY
                                        COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

                                        The beneficial effect of free trade is a consequence of a very important idea in micro-
                  comparative           economics:  comparative advantage. One country (say Mexico) has a comparative
                  advantage One country  advantage over another (say, the United States) in the production of good x if the
                  has a comparative advan-  opportunity cost of producing an additional unit of good x (e.g., clothing)—expressed
                  tage over another country  in terms of forgone units of good y (e.g., computers)—is lower in the first country
                  in the production of good x  than it is in the second country. In our example, Mexico has a comparative advantage
                  if the opportunity cost of
                  producing an additional  over the United States in the production of clothing because, as we saw above, the
                  unit of good x—expressed  opportunity cost of 1 additional unit of clothing produced in Mexico is 1/6 of a com-
                  in terms of forgone units   puter, while the opportunity cost of 1 additional unit of clothing produced in the
                  of some other good y—is  United States is 1/2 of a computer.
                  lower in the first country  By the same token, the United States has a comparative advantage over Mexico in
                  than in the second country.  the production of computers because producing 1 additional computer in the United
                                        States requires a sacrifice of 2 units of clothing, while 1 additional computer produced
                                        in Mexico requires a sacrifice of 6 units of clothing.
                  absolute advantage       Comparative advantage should be contrasted with  absolute advantage. One
                  One country has an    country has an absolute advantage over another country in the production of good x
                  absolute advantage over  if production of x in the first country requires fewer units of a scarce input (e.g., labor)
                  another country in the  than it does in the second country. In our example, the United States has an absolute
                  production of a good x if  advantage over Mexico in the production of both computers and clothing.
                  production of one unit of x
                  in the first country requires  Nevertheless, the United States benefits from free trade with Mexico, because the ben-
                  fewer units of a scarce  efits from free trade are determined by comparative advantage rather than absolute ad-
                  input (e.g., labor) than it  vantage. In general, starting from a situation in which two countries are not trading
                  does in the second country.  with each other, two countries can make themselves better off by trading when each
                                        country specializes in the production of goods for which it has a comparative advan-
                                        tage. Thus, in the previous section, we saw that when Mexico specializes in clothing
                                        production (its comparative advantage) while the United States specializes in computer
                                        production (its comparative advantage), both countries can end up strictly better off
                                        through free trade.




                  APPLICA TION  16.5

                  Gains from Free Trade                            Doha Round represents an attempt to further reduce

                                                                   barriers to trade, including services and labor.
                  Since the end of World War II, there has been a long-  However, these negotiations broke down in 2008 over
                  term trend toward reduction in barriers to interna-  disagreements on issues such as reductions of agricul-
                  tional trade. In 1948 a General Agreement on Tariffs  tural subsidies and finding ways to make pharmaceu-
                  and Trade (GATT) was signed by many nations. Over  ticals more available in developing nations (e.g., by
                  the years the GATT process was used to negotiate and  allowing production of generics in those nations).
                  implement treaties between nations to reduce tariffs  Developing nations are often reluctant to eliminate
                  and quotas on imports, subsidies to domestic indus-  import protections for their domestic manufacturing
                  tries, and other barriers to free trade. GATT was   industries. As of 2010 it is not clear whether negotia-
                  replaced in 1995 by the World Trade Organization  tions will move forward substantially any time soon.
                  (WTO), which continued this process. The latest round  Nevertheless, over the last 60 years there has been a
                  of these negotiations is the Doha Round, named after  gradual, but significant, reduction in barriers to trade
                  the original meeting in Doha, Qatar in 2001. The  worldwide.
   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717