Page 33 - SF HOSPITAL NEWS NOVEMBER 2020
P. 33

TM



        Back Cover Story:  Florigrown, Again

        Continued from page 36
                                             present law. The department argued that
        unconstitutional in Florida. A special   existing restrictions were permitted
        law favors a particular category of (usu-  because the only special treatment for
        ally) businesses unfairly.           any company was a “grandfather clause”
          A factual reminder: After our ballot   for the licenses granted after 2014 and
        initiative was approved by over 70% of   those applicants with pending suits.
        voters, Florida granted two dozen win-  None, equally, have been granted since.
        ning tickets for lucky companies to oper-  Florigrown argued that this was a sim-
        ate cannabis businesses in Florida. The   ple “statutory give-away” which created
        existing criteria would allow for any   distinct treatment, which usurps any real
        number of operators. While other com-  opportunity to any company not already
        panies meet the criteria for new licenses,   possessing a license from obtaining one.
        the state has not issued any new licenses.   Clearly a “special”, not a “general” law.
        To date, 22 licenses have been granted.   Florigrown, like many companies, paid
        Only a dozen of those are in operation.   the application fee and was put on a wait
        The licenses can be sold to qualified   list, not granted a license to operate an
        companies on a waiting list. Those   MMTC.
        licenses have sold for tens of millions of   I predicted that Florigrown was
        dollars.                             already going to win based on a different
          Questions were asked about how the   issue (“monopolies are un-American”). I
        government could defend granting     was fascinated when the court asked for
        licenses, solely, to businesses which had   the additional briefing. The “special law”
        already been approved under the 2014   issue seems like a “layup” for
        low-thc amendment or which had law-  Florigrown. How can this law not be a
        suits pending against the state, which   “special” law which gives special privi-
        were settled with a grant of a license. It’s   lege to lucky ticket holders? The state’s
        true, the only licensees allowed to oper-  argument seems weak to me, because
        ate were determined when the state   while “classes” are formed all the time
        passed the law in 2017, and every other   (such as plumbers, lawyers or any other
        qualified applicant is on a “wait list”   licensed trade), none of those licenses
        waiting for the state to change its law or   are granted to qualified applicants who
        its will. Florigrown sued because it was   are then unable to operate because a spe-
        placed on the wait list.             cific number of their trade had been met.
          The Supreme Court wanted to hear     Last month, I wrote that 2022 is likely
        more about the “special law” issue,   to see an adult-use referendum pass. I
        which was not primary in the first round.   opine that Florigrown will have an
        Florida deems “special laws” unconstitu-  MMTC license prior to that ballot initia-
        tional. “Special” laws benefit specific   tive reaching the voters, that the system
        entities, and do not allow the same ben-  in place will be found unconstitutional,
        efit for all similarly situated. The heart of   and that adult use will be legal after the
        the issue is whether the vertical integra-  2022 vote. Because, after all, we are a
        tion statute grant rights to particular   country which represents freedom and
        companies which are not afforded to   opportunity for all.
        companies, generally. Florida argued that   Awarding monopolies and preventing
        the law allows for “classes” of businesses   competition to the selected few provides
        to get particular treatment, just not spe-  no freedom or opportunity for those
        cific businesses. The law is not a “spe-  wishing to enter the industry. “Special
        cial” law, but a “general” law, uniformly   law” likely, but one way or another, the
        applied, was the argument.           Supreme Court is likely to rule that the
          Florigrown responded that this is   system we are just starting to get used to
        clearly a “special” law. Those who auto-  is unconstitutional.
        matically were given licenses by the
        department before the new criteria were    Michael Liss, Esq. can be reached at
        adopted, and all other companies, which        ml@integritycounselpa.com or
        in reality will never operate under the
                                                (561) 981-2507, located in Boca Raton.



                     Cannabis News Florida

                  Hummer Wrap COURTESY OF


















        Cannabis News Florida                                                                          cannabisnewsflorida.com                                                         November 2020                         33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36