Page 73 - 2016 NAmer Autumn TD
P. 73

Pipeline Defect                                      Pipeline Stress Corrosion Crackling
        Assessment                                           (SCC) Management



        MC140  MasterClass Series/ASME STANDARDS COURSE      MC141  MasterClass Series/ASME STANDARDS COURSE
        This two-day MasterClass provides a broad overview of analysis methods   This two-day MasterClass is intended for engineers interested in learning
        for defects in pipeline. The course begins with a summary of important   more about SCC, conducting SCC integrity assessments, and managing
        material properties and a review of integrity assessment methods for   the results of such assessments. Prerequisites are two to four years of
        pipeline defects. Analysis methods for corrosion are covered, including   experience related to pipeline integrity management and/or involvement
        each of the methods cited in the most recent version of ASME B31G –   in SCC direct assessment programs. Some prior exposure to high pH or
        Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines. A   near neutral pH SCC is desired.
        discussion on analysis methods for mechanical damage is also included.  Students should be familiar with the Canadian Energy Pipeline
        Analysis methods for cracks are covered in the second day, which   Association (CEPA) Stress Corrosion Cracking, Recommended Practices,
        begins with a basic introduction to fracture mechanics.  Attendees learn   2nd edition, as well as ASME B31.8S Managing System Integrity of Gas
        about the methods of measuring toughness associated with linearly   Pipelines, Non-mandatory Appendix A-3.
        elastic and elastic-plastic behavior. Next, the use of failure assessment
        diagrams and the development of the log-secant equation are discussed,   The class provides an overview introduction to SCC and the role of
        followed by J-integral based assessments. Finally, both propagating   risk in managing SCC. Topics to be discussed in detail include Pipeline
        fractures and fatigue are evaluated.                 Coatings, SCC Direct Assessment, Site Selection, Field Inspection
                                                             Protocol and Mitigation Options. Case studies are discussed on Decision
        You Will Learn To                                    Making and How to Respond to Finding SCC on your Pipeline System.
        •      Identify which type of analysis tool is appropriate for common defect
         types                                               You Will Learn To
        •     Apply analysis tools such as ASME B31G and RSTRENG, for metal    •     Identify the factors needed for SCC to occur on buried transmission
         loss due to corrosion                                pipelines
 WHEN TRAINING   •     Describe the limitations of employing ASME B31G and RSTRENG  •   Explain the life cycle of SCC initiation, growth, coalescence and
                                                              (potential) failure
 ALONE CAN’T    •      Apply analysis methods for mechanical damage, and understand why   •   Describe the role of cathodic protection and coatings in both high pH
         they are less accurate than those for metal loss due to corrosion
                                                              SCC and near neutral pH SCC
 SOLVE YOUR    •     Explain the difference between flow stress and toughness related   •  Describe how toughness affects the defect tolerance of a pipeline  PIPING AND PIPELINES MasterClass Series
         failures
 TALENT NEEDS,    •      Identify when fracture-mechanics based analysis tools, such as the    •  Identify factors that affect SCC growth rates, coalescence and
                                                              interaction
         log-secant approach, must be used
 ASME CAN    •     Describe how toughness affects the defect tolerance of a pipeline  •   Explain the basic elements of an SCC management plan
 HELP YOU FIND    •     Explain how pressure cycling affects fatigue lives of crack-like defects  •   Describe how SCC management decisions are made
                                                             •  Initiate the process of developing a company-specific SCC
 NEW TALENT!  Who Should Attend                               management plan
        Engineers seeking to learn more about analyzing defects in transmission
        pipelines, with at least two to four years’ experience related to pipeline   Who Should Attend
        integrity management and/or defect assessment technologies    This MasterClass is intended for engineers interested in learning more
                                                             about SCC in transmission pipelines.  Attendees should have at least two
        2 Days, 1.5 CEUs, 15 PDHS                            to four years of experience related to pipeline integrity management and
                                                             defect assessment technologies.
                                                             2 Days, 1.5 CEUs, 15 PDHs




                        MASTERCLASS INSTRUCTOR                               MASTERCLASS INSTRUCTOR
                        Tom Bubenik, PhD, has over 35 years of               Tom Bubenik, PhD, has over 35 years of
                        experience in onshore and offshore pipeline          experience in onshore and offshore pipeline
                        integrity and is recognized for his expertise in ILI   integrity and is recognized for his expertise in ILI
                        technology and pipeline degradation. A senior        technology and pipeline degradation. A senior
                        principal engineer at DNV GL, he develops and        principal engineer at DNV GL, he develops and
                        applies technologies to real world problems.         applies technologies to real world problems.
                        He has an excellent understanding of the             He has an excellent understanding of the
                        regulatory requirements, integrity threats and the   regulatory requirements, integrity threats and the
                        costs and consequences of managing pipeline          costs and consequences of managing pipeline
                        integrity. Prior to joining DNV GL, Bubenik was      integrity. Prior to joining DNV GL, Bubenik was
                        with Battelle Pipeline Simulation Facility and       with Battelle Pipeline Simulation Facility and
                        ExxonMobil Upstream Development. He is               ExxonMobil Upstream Development. He is
                        vice chair of ASME Pipeline Systems Division         vice chair of ASME Pipeline Systems Division
                        Executive Committee.                                 Executive Committee.




                                               Visit www.asme.org/shop/courses                                     71
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78