Page 570 - Environment: The Science Behind the Stories
P. 570

natural gas. Drilling in Florida waters would create jobs   bring. Others are fearful that oil leaks from the  pipe-
                            for Florida citizens as well as revenue for the state in the   line could contaminate the water supply. Some of your
                            form of royalty payments from oil and gas companies.   town’s landowners are looking forward to receiving pay-
                            However, there is always the risk of a catastrophic oil spill,   ments from TransCanada for use of their land, whereas
                            with its ecological, social, and economic impacts. Would   others dread the prospect of noise, pollution, and trees
                            you support or oppose offshore drilling off the Florida   being cut on their property. If the company receives too
                            coastline? Why? What, if any, regulations would you insist   much local opposition it says it may move the pipeline
                            be imposed on such development? What questions would   route away from your town. What information would
                            you ask of scientists before making your decision? What   you seek from  TransCanada, from your state regula-
                            factors would you consider in making your decision?  tors, and from scientists and engineers before deciding
                         6.  THINK IT THROUGH  You are the mayor of a rural      whether support for the pipeline is in the best interest of
                            Nebraska town along the route of the proposed Keystone   your town? How would you make your decision? How
                            XL pipeline extension. Some of your town’s residents   might you try to address the diverse preferences of your
                            are eager to have jobs they believe the  pipeline will   town’s residents?



                        Calculating Ecological Footprints





                        Scientists at the Global Footprint Network calculate the energy   Assume that you are an average American who burns about
                        component of our ecological footprint by estimating the amount   6.3 metric tons of oil-equivalent in fossil fuels each year and
                        of ecologically productive land and sea required to absorb the   that average terrestrial net primary productivity (p. 129) can be
                        carbon released from fossil fuel combustion. This translates   expressed as 0.0037 metric tons/ha/year. Calculate how many
                        into 4.9 ha of the average American’s 7.2-ha ecological foot-  hectares of land it would take to supply our fuel use by present-
                        print. Another way to think about our footprint, however, is   day photosynthetic production.
                        to estimate how much land would be needed to grow biomass
                        with an energy content equal to that of the fossil fuel we burn.




                                                    Hectares of land for fuel    2.  Earth’s total land area is approximately 15 billion
                                                         production              hectares. Compare this to the hectares of land for fuel
                         You                               1703                  production from the table.
                                                                              3.  In the absence of stored energy from fossil fuels, how
                         Your class                
                                                                                 large a human population could Earth support at the level
                         Your state                
                                                                                 of consumption of the average American, if all of Earth’s
                         United States                                           area were devoted to fuel production? Do you consider
                                                                                 this realistic? Provide two reasons why or why not.
                         1.  Compare the energy component of your ecological foot-
                            print calculated in this way with the 4.9 ha calculated                                               CHAPTER 19 •  FOSSIL FUELS, THEIR IMPA CT S, AND ENERGY CONSERVATI ON
                            using the method of the Global Footprint Network.
                            Explain why results from the two methods may differ.








                           STUDENTS                                          INSTRUCTORS
                           Go to MasteringEnvironmentalScience for assignments, the  Go to MasteringEnvironmentalScience for automatically
                           etext, and the Study Area with practice tests, videos, current   graded activities, current events, videos, and reading questions
                           events, and activities.                           that you can assign to your students, plus Instructor Resources.






                                                                                                                                  569







           M19_WITH7428_05_SE_C19.indd   569                                                                                    12/12/14   5:23 PM
   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575