Page 224 - Using MIS
P. 224

Guide






            immanuel Kant, data modeler






            Only the users can say whether a data model accu-    humans can do represents the real, noumenal world. A
            rately reflects their business environment. What happens   data model, therefore, is a model of a human’s model of
            when the users disagree among themselves? What if one   what appears to be “out there.” For example, a model of a
            user says orders have a single salesperson, but another says   salesperson is a model of the model that humans make of
            that sales teams produce some orders? Who is correct?  salespeople.
               It’s tempting to say, “The correct model is the one that   To return to the question that we started with, what
            better represents the real world.” The problem with this   do we do when people disagree about what should be in a
            statement is that data models do not model “the real world.”   data model? First, realize that anyone attempting to justify
            A data model is simply a model of what the data modeler
            perceives. This very important point can be difficult to un-
            derstand, but if you do understand it, you will save many
            hours in data model validation meetings and be a much
            better data modeling team member.
               The German philosopher Immanuel Kant reasoned
            that what we perceive as reality is based on our perceptive
            apparatus. That which we perceive he called phenomena.
            Our perceptions, such as of light and sound, are processed
            by  our brains and made  meaningful. But  we do  not  and
            cannot know whether the images we create from the per-
            ceptions have anything to do with what might or might not
            really be.
               Kant used the term noumenal world to refer to the es-
            sence of “things in themselves”—to whatever it is out there
            that gives rise to our perceptions and images. He used the
            term phenomenal world to refer to what we humans per-
            ceive and construct.
               It is easy to confuse the noumenal world with the
            phenomenal world, because we share the phenomenal
            world with other humans. All of us have the same mental
            apparatus, and we all make the same constructions. If
            you ask your roommate to hand you the toothpaste, she
            hands you the toothpaste, not a hairbrush. But the fact
            that we share this mutual view does not mean that the
            mutual view describes in any way what is truly out there.
            Dogs construct a world based on smells, and orca whales
            construct a world based on sounds. What the “real world”
            is to a dog, a whale, and a human are completely different.
            All of this means that we cannot ever justify a data model
            as a “better representation of the real world.” Nothing that
                                                                               Source: Lebrecht Music and Arts Photo Library/Alamy
        192
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229