Page 219 - Essentials of Human Communication
P. 219

198    Chapter 10  Members and Leaders in Small Group Communication


                 Table 10.1  social loafing
                 Here are a few factors that influence the likelihood that social loafing will occur and some correctives (Kenrick, Neuberg, &
                 Cialdini, 2007).
                    when social loafing Is More likely to Occur        Corrective
                    An individual group member’s contributions cannot be easily    Make contributions easily identifiable and make members
                    identified.                                        aware of this.
                    The punishment for or cost of poor performance is insignificant.  Reward excellent performance and/or punish poor performance.
                    The group lacks cohesion.                          Stress the importance of being part of a group or team; follow-
                                                                       ing the suggestions for group membership and leadership will
                                                                       help here.

                    The task has little personal importance.           Stress the personal connection between the members of the
                                                                       group and the task.



                                            contributions, especially before you disagree with them. In fact, it’s often wise to preface any
                                            expression of disagreement with some kind of paraphrase to ensure you really are in disagree-
                                            ment. For example, you might say, “If I understand you correctly, you feel that marketing
                                            should bear sole responsibility for updating the product database.” After waiting for the
                                            response, you would state your thoughts.

                            Communication          beware of Groupthink  In some groups, agreement among members becomes
                            Choice point           so important that it takes the form of groupthink—a tendency that shuts out realis-
                            Groupthink             tic and logical analysis of a problem and of possible alternatives (Janis, 1983; Mullen,
                            Your work group is displaying   Tara, Salas, & Driskell, 1994). Such agreement is meant to signal the “deterioration of
                  all the symptoms of groupthink you’ve read   mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group
                  about. You want to get the group’s mem-  pressures” (Janis, 1983, p. 9).
                  bers to re-evaluate their decision-making   In groupthink, members are extremely selective about the information they
                  processes. What are some of the things you   consider. They tend to ignore facts and opinions contrary to the group’s position,
                  might say to effect this change?  and they readily and uncritically accept those that support the group’s position.
                                                   When you recognize that groupthinking is occurring, try the following:
                                             ●  When too-simple solutions are offered to problems, try to illustrate (with specific exam-
                                               ples, if possible) for the group members how the complexity of the problem is not going
                 Explore the Concept           to yield to the solutions offered.
                 “Enhancing Groups” at
                 MyCommunicationLab          ●  When you feel that members are not expressing their doubts about the group’s decisions,
                                               encourage them to voice disagreement, to play devil’s advocate, to test the adequacy of the
                                               solution. If you feel there is unexpressed disagreement, ask specifically if anyone disagrees.
                                             ●  To combat the group pressure toward agreement, reward members who do voice dis-
                                               agreement or doubt. Say, for example, “That’s a good argument; we need to hear more
                                               about the potential problems of this proposal. Does anyone else see any problems?”


                            video Choice point
                            leading in service learning
                            Charles has joined an ongoing service learning group with three other students and wants
                   to make a worthwhile contribution. But the other members, who have already been working together for
                   a week, consistently ignore his cues when he wants to say something. And when he does manage to say
                   something, no one reacts. He’s determined to change this situation as he considers the topics covered in
                   this chapter—for example, the functional and dysfunctional roles of group members, the importance of
                   group norms, and the skills of group members and leaders, and considers his various communication
                   choices and their potential effects. See how his choices play out in the video “Leading in Service Learning” .

                       Watch the Video “Leading in Service Learning” at MyCommunicationLab
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224