Page 209 - Introduction to Business
P. 209

CHAPTER 5   Managing and Organizing Business  183


                    Let’s apply the six sigma concept to that of a major airline and the  EXHIBIT 5.7
                 problem of lost passenger luggage (see Exhibit 5.7). A perfect outcome,
                                                                                Airline Lost Luggage and Control
                 of course, would be one where the airline loses absolutely zero luggage.  Standards (per year, 1 million
                 Realistically, though, all airlines lose at least some passenger luggage, as  pieces of baggage handled)
                 it’s virtually impossible to completely prevent some loss when handling
                 millions of pieces of passenger luggage each year. The question be-  Two sigma   308,537  bags lost
                 comes, how much lost luggage is too much? Assuming an airline han-  Three sigma   66,807  bags lost
                 dles 1 million pieces of passenger luggage per year, a two sigma stan-  Four sigma  6,210  bags lost
                 dard of control will mean that 308,537 pieces of luggage (nearly 31  Five sigma     223  bags lost
                 percent) are lost every year—not very good. If an airline has a three  Six sigma      3.4 bags lost
                 sigma standard, 66,807 pieces of luggage out of a million are lost every
                 year, or about 7 percent of the luggage handled. A four sigma standard
                 means that only 6210 pieces of luggage out of 1 million handled annually will be
                 lost, a five sigma standard means losing only 223 pieces of luggage, and a six sigma
                 standard means that only 3.4 pieces of luggage out of 1 million handled annually
                 will be lost by the airline. Implementation of a six sigma standard of control means
                 that passengers will not lose their luggage 99.999997 percent of the time, which is
                 probably as close to perfection as realistically possible.
                    Lets assume a major airline is currently operating at a three sigma defects level
                 with respect to lost luggage; it loses about 7 percent of the luggage. But it wants to
                 move to a six sigma standard. The company first develops plans for adopting this
                 standard, and then organizes (e.g., six sigma councils and various other kinds of
                 organizational structures may be necessary) for this change of approach. The com-
                 pany follows this up by motivating, guiding, and leading, that is, directing, employ-
                 ees through this change.
                    In terms of the final management function, controlling, the company has estab-
                 lished a clear performance standard—six sigma—only 3.4 bags per million lost. It
                 will then monitor whether this standard is met. If it is indeed met, things are great,
                 everyone is happy, and ongoing company six sigma activities will likely simply just
                 continue. What happens if 200 pieces of luggage out of a million are lost by the air-
                 line during the coming year—a performance slightly better than five sigma but not
                 six sigma? In such a situation the airline might say this is good enough and adjust
                 its standards a bit. Alternatively, the airline might say that a six sigma standard
                 means a six sigma standard and that 200 pieces of luggage lost means 200 angry
                 passengers and this is too many. In this case, the airline will have to take some cor-
                 rective actions to bolster its six sigma initiative during the coming year. 25
                   reality      Has your airline luggage or a package you’ve shipped ever been lost?
                  CH ECK        How did the carrier respond to the loss, and what level of quality con-
                                trol did they appear to have?


                     Kinds of Managers

                     LEARNING OBJECTIVE 7
                     Describe the basic kinds of managers within organizations.
                 All managers are to some extent involved with all the management functions—plan-
                 ning, organizing, directing, and controlling—but their involvement with these func-
                 tions varies considerably depending on their area of management and their level
                 within the organization. For example, certain financial managers in a company,
                 such as internal auditors, may be primarily involved in a control management role,
                 while certain operations managers, such as manufacturing plant superintendents,
                 may spend most of their time in a directing role. Similarly, top managers in a


                 Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214